IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iacpro/2704529.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Implementation of the presumption of innocence principle in European Court of Human Rights and legal proceedings of Finland

Author

Listed:
  • Vladimir Jilkine

    (Rigas Stradina University, Riga , Latvia)

Abstract

The presumption of innocence is considered by the European Court of Human Rights, not only as a principle of criminal justice, but also as a "concrete and real" defendant's right to be presumed innocent until the moment of procedural instance described by paragraph 2, article 6 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. A case procedure is based on the presumption of innocence and the interpretation of doubt in favour of the defendant, protects the suspect, meanwhile the officials authorized to conduct the preliminary investigation, are warned against voicing any allegations. Application of the presumption of innocence in Finland is regarded not only in criminal proceedings but also at a much wider spectrum - in tax, environmental, migration and commercial law. These cases are dealt with in the administrative and commercial courts.This article discusses examples for the application of presumption of innocence in the Supreme Court and the Supreme Administrative Court of Finland.

Suggested Citation

  • Vladimir Jilkine, 2015. "Implementation of the presumption of innocence principle in European Court of Human Rights and legal proceedings of Finland," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 2704529, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:2704529
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/18th-international-academic-conference-london/table-of-content/detail?cid=27&iid=056&rid=4529
    File Function: First version, 2015
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    international law; the presumption of innocence; the paradigmatic function of the case-law of the ECHR; the national courts of Finland.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K33 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - International Law
    • K14 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Criminal Law
    • K10 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - General (Constitutional Law)

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:2704529. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.