IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iacpro/2604148.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Effect of rear-side surface morphology on the performance for PERC solar cell

Author

Listed:
  • Chih-Hsiang Yang

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, National Chung Hsing University)

  • Shui-Yang Lien

    (Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Da-Yeh University)

  • Kuei-Ching Wu

    (Crystalline silicon R&D. section, MOSEL VITELIC INC.)

  • Chung-Yuan Kung

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, National Chung Hsing University)

Abstract

Rear-side passivated solar cell is one of the next-generation concepts for industrial mass production lines. The most suitable candidate for P-type silicon rear-side passivation is aluminum oxide (Al2O3) due to its excellent field effect passivation effect than any other dielectric material. Reduction of surface recombination mainly leads to an improvement of open-circuit voltage (Voc), yielding a higher conversion efficiency. In this study we investigate two kinds of rear-side surface morphologies: polished surface (with 3~6 µm etch depth) and fully textured pyramids, where the Al2O3 thin films deposit using self-developed non-vacuum spatial atomic layer deposition system. The polished surface is obtained after further etching the pyramid structures, needing a 6 vol % KOH solution at 80°C for about 3.5 min. Although further polishing process may enhance the cost of production, it is necessary to proceed the step for achieving better performance of PERC cells. Various surface morphologies have been compared in terms of surface recombination velocity, contact resistance and optical performance, having impacts on Voc, fill factor (FF), and short-circuit current (Jsc), respectively. The experimental results show that the surface with less roughness allows Al2O3 thin films to be deposited well. The rear surface recombination velocity is strongly reduced for flattened surfaces attributed to changes in crystal orientation and reduced surface area, leading to higher value of Voc. In contrast, the coverage of Al2O3 thin films on textured surface may probably be damaged at the peak and valley areas, thus the worse Voc is obtained. A polished rear surface, looking like a mirror, reflects more long-wavelength incident light at the range of 700 to 1200 nm than the amount that the textured surface reflects. This is likely due to the reduction of light scattering or absorption from particles or defects existing before polishing process. The discrepancy in reflection can be clearly proved by internal quantum efficiency. More trapped light excite more photogenerated carriers to be collected, enhancing the value of Jsc. The rear-side textured sample has slightly lower FF than that of the sample with polished surface. It can be explained that worse coverage of passivation layer and metal contact lead to higher reverse saturation current and contact resistance, respectively. Besides, effects of various rear-side morphologies on the formation of Al-Si alloy, which may influence the electrical performance of cells are investigated. Finally, the PERC cell with polished surface has a better conversion efficiency of 19.15 %.

Suggested Citation

  • Chih-Hsiang Yang & Shui-Yang Lien & Kuei-Ching Wu & Chung-Yuan Kung, 2015. "Effect of rear-side surface morphology on the performance for PERC solar cell," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 2604148, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:2604148
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/17th-international-academic-conference-vienna/table-of-content/detail?cid=26&iid=107&rid=4148
    File Function: First version, 2015
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    surface morphology; self-developed non-vacuum spatial atomic layer deposition; long-wavelength light;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q40 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - General
    • Q20 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:2604148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.