IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iacpro/15516947.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Study on the Usability Evaluation of the Forest Digital Detox App

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Tayyib

    (Inje university, department of U-Design)

  • Suyeon Seo

    (Inje university, BK21 FOUR Healthcare 4CDesign Leaders)

  • Anyoung Ryou

    (Inje University, Divison of Multimedia Design)

Abstract

Smartphone dependency presents risks to mental well-being, prompting the development of digital-detox applications aimed at enhancing focus and productivity.Forest, a widely used focus application employing gamification through virtual tree cultivation, boasts a substantial user base; however, its usability has not been subjected to rigorous evaluation. This study sought to assess the usability of Forest's user interface (UI) to optimize user experience (UX) and reinforce its efficacy in supporting digital detoxification, while simultaneously contributing to the field of human-computer interaction research.A mixed-methods evaluation was conducted with a sample of five participants. Guided by Nielsen's usability heuristics, the study centered on user control, personalization, clarity, and visibility.Participants completed a five-item Likert-scale questionnaire and participated in semi-structured interviews to explore UX challenges and propose design enhancements. Evaluation elements encompassed the time selector, plant button, warning pop-up, ambient-sound control, and tree-selection functionalities.Survey results indicated favorable ratings for time-selector clarity, start-button discoverability, and tree-selection flexibility, each achieving a score of 4.0/5. In contrast, warning message clarity received a score of 3.8/5, and ambient-sound usefulness was rated at 2.0/5.Interviews highlighted strengths such as the intuitive time selection process, readily discoverable controls, and unambiguous visual prompts.Conversely, users expressed concerns regarding the complexity of the time wheel, the inadequate discoverability of the ambient-sound feature, small font sizes and low contrast ratios, the suboptimal organization of settings, and the absence of an automatic background-lock function.Based on these findings, the authors recommend incorporating a digital time-input alternative or enhancing the clarity of the time wheel, providing more accessible and adaptable ambient-sound controls, improving text legibility and accessibility options, restructuring the settings UI, reducing the plant-button delay, and implementing a focus-mode auto-lock.While the sample size was limited, addressing these identified usability issues has the potential to improve user satisfaction and more effectively support digital detoxification objectives. Future research will employ larger and more diverse samples and conduct comparative analyses between Forest and other digital detox applications to validate the generalizability of the findings and to identify variations in usability patterns across diverse user groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Tayyib & Suyeon Seo & Anyoung Ryou, 0000. "A Study on the Usability Evaluation of the Forest Digital Detox App," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 15516947, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:15516947
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/iises-international-academic-conference-rome-2025/table-of-content/detail?cid=155&iid=014&rid=16947
    File Function: First version, 0000
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:15516947. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.