IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iacpro/1003878.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Citizen participation and social dialogue: journalistic culture in Russia

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Anikina

    (Lomonosov Moscow State University)

Abstract

Proposed paper is based on results of empirical studies of Russian journalists realized within the frames of two projects ? ?Journalism in Change - Professional Journalistic Cultures in Poland, Russia and Sweden? (2011-2014) and ?Media Systems in Flux: The Challenge of the BRICS Countries? (2012-2016) ? searching journalism doctrines in last decades. Sociological studies let to discuss the potential of social dialogue from media perspective, to formulate assumptions about the readiness of journalistic community to organize and support citizen activity. The quantitative survey of 500 journalists from different Russian regions in ?Journalism in change?? project clarifies that such factors as the chance to hold social service, to supply social demand are valued relatively low when respondents reflecting the roles of journalism in society and the choice of a working place. Factor analysis shows that integrated factor related to social development is weaker than the factor related to creative growth of a journalist (the indicators are 3,7 and 3,83 out of 5 ? respectively). Results show that Russian journalists do not give high estimations to such social functions as public opinion formation, social mobilization of people etc. Moderate orientation to citizen participation differentiates journalistic culture in Russia from professional cultures in European countries. The qualitative study of 48 journalists working in traditional and online media located Moscow region in ?Media Systems in Flux?? project allows to stress that metropolitan journalists stay quite passive in civic life. Only few respondents are the members of NGOs, parties or social movements what indirectly confirms weak inclination to realize any social activity except information one. Since 83% of respondents from online media 54% of traditional ones have positive attitude to citizen activity and protests, general attitude to social movements of last years in Russia among journalists is moderate: ?If we speak about protests of 2011-2012 I am tolerant? (male, old media). Discussion about the protests represents the opposition that exists in journalistic culture. The differentiation between political positions, personal and professional viewpoints is obvious: ?We understand that politics is superficial issue. There are things fastening us stronger? (male respondent, traditional media). Often people describe the protests from professional point, stress professional aspect of journalist?s participation in citizen movements.The paper argues that in current context in Russia journalists form specific type of professional culture combining the tendency to creative development with peculiar civic positions what in certain sense impedes social dialogue in Russian public sphere.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Anikina, 2015. "Citizen participation and social dialogue: journalistic culture in Russia," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 1003878, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:1003878
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/international-academic-conference-rome/table-of-content/detail?cid=10&iid=019&rid=3878
    File Function: First version, 2015
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    journalistic culture; social dialogue; social roles of media; empirical studies; participation;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:1003878. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.