IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iacpro/1003466.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Capitalising on the benefits of participatory research partnerships to promote health and well-being in vulnerable communities

Author

Listed:
  • Ronel Ferreira

    (University of Pretoria)

Abstract

In this paper I illustrate how participatory intervention research can be utilized to promote health and well-being in vulnerable communities. More specifically, I posit that the key to vulnerable communities taking ownership and addressing the challenges they face lies in strong research partnerships, where university researchers and community stakeholders (e.g. teachers and community volunteers) collaborate. As co-researchers, community stakeholders are required to gradually take the lead in participatory intervention projects, and subsequently function in an independent sustainable manner. My theory is based on two broad research projects, employing similar methodology yet involving different stakeholders as participants. The first project commenced in 2003 (on-going), initially involving teachers as participants. This longitudinal project?s (STAR ? Supporting Teachers, Assets and Resilience) focus falls on the way in which teachers can promote resilience among vulnerable children or families, by implementing a strength-based philosophy when planning and introducing supportive initiatives in school-communities. Based on the positive outcome of the STAR study (which eventually involved 74 teachers from 12 schools), a follow-up study has been conducted since 2012, involving 38 community volunteers as participants, or rather co-researchers. The follow-up SHEBA (Supporting Home environments in Beating Adversity) project utilizes a similar research design, and focuses on the way in which community volunteers can rely on a strength-based philosophy to support vulnerable clients. Data have been generated and documented over the past more than a decade for the two projects by means of participatory reflection and action based activities and discussions, focus groups, individual interviews, observations, field notes, research diaries and visual techniques. Two primary investigators have taken the lead, involving several academic peers and postgraduate students as co-researchers, working alongside the participating teachers and volunteers. Even though these projects have resulted in rich findings in various related knowledge fields, this presentation specifically concerns the fundamental role of sound research partnerships in promoting sustainable health and well-being among people facing risk and adversity. Research partnerships and collaboration are foregrounded as protective factor within the broader resilience theory framework. In addition to my focus on methodology as basis for the argument, I also link my discussion to strength-based philosophies, as foundation of positive psychology theory. Within the global context of high incidences of vulnerability and increased demands for support on various levels, the possibility of people on ground level taking the lead in providing such support will not only add to existing theory, but also imply practical application value.

Suggested Citation

  • Ronel Ferreira, 2015. "Capitalising on the benefits of participatory research partnerships to promote health and well-being in vulnerable communities," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 1003466, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:1003466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/international-academic-conference-rome/table-of-content/detail?cid=10&iid=056&rid=3466
    File Function: First version, 2015
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Participatory intervention research; Research partnerships; Research collaboration; Vulnerable communities; Resilience; Positive psychology; Strength-based; philosophy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I30 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General
    • C18 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Methodolical Issues: General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:1003466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.