IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sef/csefwp/788.html

Contesting Influence: U.S. Aid Responses to Chinese Financing

Author

Listed:
  • Emmanuel Caiazzo

    (Parthenope University of Naples and MoFiR.)

  • Pietro Panizza

    (University of Calabria)

  • Alberto Zazzaro

    (University of Naples Federico II, CSEF and MoFiR.)

Abstract

Competition between the United States and China is likely to shape the course of history in the coming years. Does foreign aid constitute an arena of confrontation? Using the OECD Creditor Reporting System and the Global Chinese Development Finance Dataset, we study the relationship between the aid-commitment strategies of Beijing and Washington. Employing an instrumental variables approach, we find that the United States increases its aid commitments in recipient countries where China commits more funds. The effect is stronger when the United States has close political or commercial ties with the recipient country and is larger in years of heightened US–China political disagreement. These findings are consistent with a framework in which the two countries compete to acquire influence over the recipient countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Emmanuel Caiazzo & Pietro Panizza & Alberto Zazzaro, 2026. "Contesting Influence: U.S. Aid Responses to Chinese Financing," CSEF Working Papers 788, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy.
  • Handle: RePEc:sef:csefwp:788
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.csef.it/WP/wp788.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • F35 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - Foreign Aid
    • O19 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - International Linkages to Development; Role of International Organizations

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sef:csefwp:788. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Maria Carannante (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cssalit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.