IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sdk/wpaper/91.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Treatise on Money – et teorihistorisk case studie

Author

Listed:
  • Finn Olesen

    (Department of Environmental and Business Economics, University of Southern Denmark)

Abstract

På sin vis kan man betragte hele Keynes’ forfatterskab som en langstrakt kamp for at formulere et relevant alternativ til den herskende ortodoksi. Som bekendt kom dette gennembrud først i 1936 med udgivelsen af The General Theory. I nærværende papir skal der sættes fokus på et af bidragene i denne langstrakte frigørelsesproces. Det er således papirets hensigt at sætte fokus på A Treatise on Money i den hensigt at forsøge at belyse vigtigheden af dette værk i den ovennævnte intellektuelle frigørelsesproces. Konklusionen på gennemgangen er, at Keynes i Treatise ikke på en tilstrækkelig overbevisende måde fik besvaret de to helt centrale spørgsmål: 1) hvorfor kommer en makroøkonomi uden for den postulerede ligevægt? og 2) hvordan bevæger økonomien sig dynamisk i et uligevægtspræget forløb hen imod en ny ligevægt? Nogle mere til fredsstillende svar herpå måtte afvente fremkomsten af The General Theory. Jeg skal takke Henrik Preben Perregaard og Tommy S. Poulsen for kommen-tarer til en tidligere version af dette papir.

Suggested Citation

  • Finn Olesen, 2009. "A Treatise on Money – et teorihistorisk case studie," Working Papers 91/09, University of Southern Denmark, Department of Sociology, Environmental and Business Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:sdk:wpaper:91
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sdu.dk/~/media/Files/Om_SDU/Institutter/Miljo/ime/wp/olesen91.ashx
    File Function: First version, 2009-05
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sdk:wpaper:91. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ulla H. Oehlenschläger (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iehhsdk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.