IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

VaR competition: Measuring the degree of adjustment of Value at Risk methodologies

Listed author(s):
  • Clara I. Gonzalez


    (Research Bank of Spain)

  • Ricardo Gimeno

    (Banco de Espana)

The objective of this paper is the evaluation of different Value at Risk (VaR) methodologies. In particular, four VaR methodologies (Normal, GARCH, Historical Simulation and Extreme Values (EV)), are compared for 36 indexes covering stock-exchanges worldwide. This paper proposes for the EV approach an automatic procedure to obtain the threshold that divides the distribution between extreme values and normal ones, using this threshold to estimate the tail index of the Pareto distribution. This tail index is usually estimated by plotting the Hill Estimator and choosing the value of the threshold in the region where this estimator becomes stable. This procedure is discretional since a decision maker is required in order to fix the threshold. In the present article we propose an automatic procedure based on the computation of successive normality tests over the whole distribution. We establish multicriteria rankings for better hedging the market risk through three concrete measures: the proportion of returns that fell out of VaR value, mean VaR, and finally, the total amount of losses over the VaR. It is shown that, for the lower significance levels, EV methodology with a Pareto distribution for the tails, as built in this paper, is the best suited approach.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by Society for Computational Economics in its series Computing in Economics and Finance 2006 with number 429.

in new window

Date of creation: 04 Jul 2006
Handle: RePEc:sce:scecfa:429
Contact details of provider: Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sce:scecfa:429. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.