IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Ambiguity, No Arbitrage, Coherence and Artificial Financial Markets

  • Hendri Adriaens

    ()

    (Econometrics & Operations Research Tilburg University)

  • Bertrand Melenberg

    (Econometrics & Operations Research Tilburg University)

  • Bas Donkers

    (Erasmus University)

In many traditional financial and economic models, economic agents are assumed to make decisions using expected lifetime utility under rational expectations, where rational expectations are assumed to be formed on the basis of sufficient knowledge of the data generating process. But the mere existence of econometricians modelling and estimating data generating (risky) processes already indicates the presence of ambiguity on the `true' data generating (possibly non-risky) process. There might be ambiguity because of sampling error (due to estimation), but there might also be ambiguity resulting from potential modelling error (due to a wrong choice of model class describing the data generating process). Rational agents will (try to) incorporate such ambiguity when making their decisions. In this paper we first investigate the implications for modelling asset prices in financial markets under the assumption of no arbitrage when there is ambiguity. We argue that coherence, as introduced by Shafer and Vovk (2001), becomes the guiding principle in modelling financial markets without arbitrage opportunities. Next, we illustrate that artificial financial markets, that can be investigated using microscopic simulation techniques, is a natural way to study coherent financial markets under ambiguity

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by Society for Computational Economics in its series Computing in Economics and Finance 2006 with number 340.

as
in new window

Length:
Date of creation: 04 Jul 2006
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:sce:scecfa:340
Contact details of provider: Web page: http://comp-econ.org/
Email:


More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sce:scecfa:340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.