CART analysis of qualitative variables to improve credit rating processes
Qualitative behaviours of small firms are explored to forecast criticalities in the Italian credit market. We build up an evaluation process to integrate quantitative rating practices. Research method: Relevant qualitative factors to estimate the credit risk are empirically investigated by choosing variables related to seven perspectives of analysis (sector, governance, internal processes, learning and growth, customers, economic-financial analysis, quality of balance sheet). Outcomes have been elaborated through the Classification And Regression Tree. Rating evaluation is based upon qualitative factors. Findings: The capability to forecast bad firms is 92.4\%, while 84.5\% is the percentage to forecast good firms. The Cumulative Accuracy Curve shows the 84\% ability to explain the variance of phenomenon. Main results: ratings of firms are primary explained by aptitude to reach short and long term purposes; banksâ€™ analysts should integrate their quantitative models with qualitative data; methodologies employed offer a quantitative solution to estimate the weight of each variable. Conclusions: When balance sheets are characterized by small consistency, qualitative variables should be taken into consideration to elaborate or integrate rating procedures.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sce:scecfa:179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.