Testing for Recent Trends in US Productivity Growth
There is no shortage of opinions and discussion about recent productivity growth trends. In contrast, relatively little attention is paid to the degree of uncertainty surrounding recent estimates of such growth trends. This paper makes two contributions to the scant body of research that quantifies the precision with which such trends are estimated. It proposes a new test for recent breaks in trend when the breakpoint is not precisely known. The test is robust to departures from normality, reasonably sized in small samples, has the power to detect economically significant changes in productivity growth, and can be used to test for breakpoints with as little as a single observation. It examines the impact of data revision on the reliablity of tests for trend breaks using a new real-time data set for US Output per Person-Hour in the Non-Farm Business Sector recently made available by the St. Louis Federal Reserve Board. As noted by Arouba (2005), data revision in productivity data seems to be larger than in many other macroeconomic series (including output, inflation or unemployment.) We find that the failure to take account of the data revision process causes important distortions in tests for trend breaks
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sce:scecfa:177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.