IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sce/scecf9/741.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Learning and the Law of Iterated Projections

Author

Listed:
  • Bartholomew Moore

    () (Fordham University)

  • Huntley Schaller

    () (Carleton University)

Abstract

Equilibrium prices or quantities in very broad classes of models depend on iterated expectations of an autoregressive forcing variable. Examples of this dependence include that of stock prices on autoregressive dividends, that of the price level or exchange rate on an autoregressive money supply, that of consumption on autoregressive income, and that of investment on autoregressive interest rates, output demand, or technology shocks. In this paper, we show that, under learning, these iterated expectations are not a certainty equivalence. Further, we show that the certainty equivalent form of iterated expectations typically used in the literature ignores covariance terms that help explain empirical anomalies in a variety of macroeconomic models. We illustrate the consequences for two examples. In the first, a permanent-income/life-cycle model of consumption, we show that learning about an autoregressive income process can explain the widely observed negative correlation of consumption growth and current income. In the second, a present-value model of an asset price, learning about the autoregressive dividend process can help explain the empirical finding that dividend yields predict excess returns. Since, under learning, the iterated expectations terms are extremely complex, we develop a numerical (Monte Carlo) method for finding a polynomial approximation. A unique feature of our method is that we approximate the agents' subjective expectations. Therefore, in the spirit of individual learning, our method utilizes only information that is available to the agent.

Suggested Citation

  • Bartholomew Moore & Huntley Schaller, 1999. "Learning and the Law of Iterated Projections," Computing in Economics and Finance 1999 741, Society for Computational Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:sce:scecf9:741
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sce:scecf9:741. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/sceeeea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.