IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Organizational Structure and Perpetual Innovation: A Computational Model of a Retail Chain

Listed author(s):
  • Myong-Hun Chang


    (Cleveland State University)

  • Joseph Harrington, Jr.


    (Johns Hopkins University)

A computational model of a retail chain is developed in which store managers continually search for better practices through innovation. The search is carried out over a rugged landscape defined over the space of store practices with profit being determined by the interaction of a store's current practices and the distribution of consumer preferences in its market. Given a fixed process by which new ideas are generated, organizational structure influences the process by which new ideas become new practices. The main objective of this research is to compare the relative performance of centralized and decentralized organizational structures in terms of profit generated over the short run and long run. When the market environment is fixed over time, centralization is found to outperform decentralization in the short run when markets are relatively homogeneous and consumers are sufficiently sensitive to store practices. The primary force at work is that the centralized retail chain induces uniformity in store practices. By keeping stores at the same point on the landscape, this promotes interstore learning; what is uncovered and passed along by one store is apt to be of value to other stores. Centralization then promotes effective sharing of ideas and this results in a rapid convergence to an optimum. The superior performance of centralization for some market environment is restricted, however, to the short run because the global optimum under centralization in inherently inferior to that under decentralization as a result of restricting stores to having the same practices. Under decentralization, each store can, in the long run, more effectively tailor its practices to its own market and thereby this organizational form eventually outperforms a more centralized organization. When the analysis is extended to accommodate the possibility of a changing market environment, the short-run superiority of a centralized retail chain can be extended to the long run. With the market environment continually changing, the spillovers between stores that is promoted under centralization becomes a dominant force. Quite contrary to the usual claim that volatility in markets requires a more flexible decentralized form, we find that it is the centralized organization with coordinated search that is more effective in responding to a new environment.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by Society for Computational Economics in its series Computing in Economics and Finance 1999 with number 242.

in new window

Date of creation: 01 Mar 1999
Handle: RePEc:sce:scecf9:242
Contact details of provider: Postal:
CEF99, Boston College, Department of Economics, Chestnut Hill MA 02467 USA

Fax: +1-617-552-2308
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sce:scecf9:242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.