IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Learning Schemes in Evolutionary Game Theory: Application to a Model of Entry in a Regulated Market

Listed author(s):
  • Iqbal Adjali


    (BT Laboratories)

  • A. A. Reeder


    (BT Laboratories)

  • David Collings


    (BT Laboratories)

  • M. H. Lyons


    (BT Laboratories)

  • A. Varley


    (BT Laboratories)

Registered author(s):

    In this paper we investigate different learning schemes in dynamic game theory and consider their relative importance when constructing strategic decision models for economic and business applications. The different models of learning dynamics we have formulated fall into three main categories: repeated games, discrete-time replicator games and discrete-time best-response games. Repeated games are a basic repetition of one-shot games, replicator games are inspired from applications of EGT to evolutionary biology, and best-response games combine to some extent many of the desirable properties of evolutionary learning with a more realistic economic interpretation of the decision making process. In all three approaches, the models are considered in their basic deterministic form as well as when stochastic behaviour and the effects of a variable memory of past moves and discounting are included. As a specific example, we run computer simulations of a simplified market-entry model in the context of the telecommunication industry. There are four players in the game: the incumbent, the market follower, the potential entrant, and the regulator. Each player has its own strategy set and characteristics, such as extent of adaptation and uncertainty about the environment. One important conclusion is that the choice of learning mechanism in the formulation of dynamic games has a drastic effect on the results obtained and is likely to be highly context dependent. Our results show that each approach has its merits and shortcomings. In particular, the use of best-response games with mixed strategy updating seems to offer a richer behavior range than its repeated game counterpart and a more realistic (short-term) evolution of the players' behaviors than the equivalent replicator game. We conclude by summarizing the main points and suggesting directions for future work.

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Paper provided by Society for Computational Economics in its series Computing in Economics and Finance 1999 with number 123.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 01 Mar 1999
    Handle: RePEc:sce:scecf9:123
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    CEF99, Boston College, Department of Economics, Chestnut Hill MA 02467 USA

    Fax: +1-617-552-2308
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sce:scecf9:123. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.