IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Cointegration Modeling of Expected Exchange Rates

Listed author(s):
  • Robert A. Connolly


    (University of North Carolina)

  • Paisan Limratanamongkol


    (University of North Carolina)

An enduring problem in international finance is forward premium bias. Forward rates consistently provide biased estimates of future exchange rate movements. Some attack the rationality assumption for the foreign exchange market, claiming the forward premium may reflect irrational expectations of market participants. Our work re-addresses this evidence. In particular, our paper studies the process by which exchange rate expectations adjust. If foreign exchange market participants are rational, exchange rate forecasts of those agents should be matched to the subsequent realization of the exchange rate, i.e., rational forecasts of a time series and the observed series should be cointegrated. We apply this insight to multiple exchange rate series and a corresponding set of market expectations of future values of the exchange rate series. We build a cointegration (and associated error-correction) model of actual and expected exchange rates for seven exchange rates, using weekly expectations data from Money Market Services, International for the 1986Ü1997 period. We picture the connections between actual and expected exchange rates. And, the error-correction model estimates provide an interesting picture of the dynamic process by which exchange rate expectations adjust to movements in exchange rates and realized forecasting errors. We contrast our findings with other expectations-adjustment models. Our paper has several distinctive features. First, we do not assume symmetric adjustment of cointegration errors, but instead use threshold cointegration methods. We get strong evidence of cointegration between the exchange rate series and the expected rates series. Second, in pretesting individual series for I(1) properties, we apply the Enders-Granger (1998) momentum threshold autoregressive model. Here, the unit-root test admits the possibility of asymmetric adjustments to deviations from unit-root behavior. When the forecast error is positive, we may observe a different autoregressive coefficient than when negative. While unit-root tests cannot reject the null hypothesis of unit roots, we find clear evidence of asymmetric adjustments in about 25 per cent of the cases. Third, our sample period, 1986Ü1997, has witnessed significant shifts in institutional exchange rate arrangements, such as Great Britain's entry and exit from the Exchange Rate Mechanism. Structural shifts are important to the economics and econometrics of our investigation. Because structural shifts can compromise standard cointegration tests, we apply the test methods developed by Gregory and Hansen (1996). Despite evidence of structural shifts, the cointegration evidence remains very compelling. Fourth, in work still underway, we are investigating several issues raised by our results. We are probing the extent to which structural shifts may masquerade as threshold behavior.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by Society for Computational Economics in its series Computing in Economics and Finance 1999 with number 1112.

in new window

Date of creation: 01 Mar 1999
Handle: RePEc:sce:scecf9:1112
Contact details of provider: Postal:
CEF99, Boston College, Department of Economics, Chestnut Hill MA 02467 USA

Fax: +1-617-552-2308
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sce:scecf9:1112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.