IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Fundamental Uncertainties and Firm-level Stock Volatilities

Listed author(s):
  • Yang Yu


    (Economics SUNY at Buffalo)

Registered author(s):

    Firm-level stock volatility has increased significantly since 1962 and varies widely across industries. Recent literature shows that the excessive and persistent stock volatility can be well explained by fundamental uncertainties. This paper conducted panel data analyses on 415 firms during 1988-2001 in an effort to study the extent to which variation of individual stock returns can be explained by fundamental uncertainties. Mainly, we examined the uncertainty effects of demand shifts and a firm’s innovative activities as well as other firm and industry characteristic variables on firm level idiosyncratic stock volatility. The results from the panel data analyses suggest that R&D intensive firms or firms in high-tech industries have more volatile returns. Idiosyncratic volatility is higher when there is greater demand uncertainty. Data also support the prediction that idiosyncratic volatility is higher for small firms and a firm with higher volatility of profitability. In addition, we find some evidence that idiosyncratic volatility increases with variation in analysts’ earnings forecasts used as a proxy for changes in expectations that are associated with uncertainty and heterogeneous belief. Trading volume, which is used as a control variable for the information arrival, is found to endogenously increase idiosyncratic volatility. Furthermore, a firm’s leverage is observed to have a significant and positive effect on idiosyncratic volatility in our whole panel data sample as well as the down market sample. However, we also observed a reverse leverage effect in the upward market sample. Finally, various empirical tests suggest that the idiosyncratic volatilities are persistent.

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Paper provided by Society for Computational Economics in its series Computing in Economics and Finance 2005 with number 466.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 11 Nov 2005
    Handle: RePEc:sce:scecf5:466
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sce:scecf5:466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.