IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Paper or Plastic? The Effect of Time on Check and Debit Card Use at Grocery Stores


  • Elizabeth Klee

    () (Division of Monetary Affairs Federal Reserve Board)


Economists have long recognized that the time costs of using different forms of money can be significant and potentially affect the type of media of exchange used. Banks and retailers recognize these costs as well, and market transponder devices to pay for tolls, food and gas as a way to minimize checkout time. But although there is theoretical research and anecdotal evidence that suggest time is an important element in determining the use of media of exchange, there is little empirical work documenting the magnitude of this effect. Most empirical work on consumer’s use of payment systems uses survey data. The results from this literature indicate that payment choices depend critically on consumer income, age and demographic characteristics. To fill this gap, this paper uses scanner data from grocery store transactions to examine time costs associated with media of exchange. Grocery store scanner data has been used extensively in other contexts, for example, in estimating elasticities of demand for consumer products and in constructing price indexes for goods. Scanner data is an ideal medium for examining time costs associated with media of exchange as well. First, these data represent actual market exchanges, are very accurate, and are available at a very high frequency. Second, grocery store retailers spend much time and effort in minimizing the length of time for checkout transactions, partly driven by the industry's relatively low margins. And third, everyone eats, everyone eats often, and everyone goes grocery shopping. Because groceries are perishable, consumers shop often, and thus this type of exchange is arguably one of the more frequent that a typical consumer makes. Using check and debit card transactions only to control for the effects of availability of different payment instruments, census tract information to proxy for demographic characteristics, and econometric procedures to control for the endogeneity of the choice of payment instrument and the realized length of time of the transaction, the results indicate that check transactions are, on average, predicted to be approximately 40 seconds longer than debit card transactions. Moreover, payment choices are correlated with the demographics of the local market. Furthermore, tests for enodgeneity show that consumers choose debit cards over checks in part because they expect debit card transactions to be faster than check transactions. Interestingly, the results suggest that debit card users are, on an absolute basis, more time sensitive than check users, and in particular, these sensitivities vary by the demographics of the local market. Overall, the results in this paper support the theoretical literature on media of exchange and the empirical literature using survey data. Time factors significantly determine use of media of exchange, and sensitivity to these time factors depend on the income, age and demographic characteristics of the local market

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth Klee, 2005. "Paper or Plastic? The Effect of Time on Check and Debit Card Use at Grocery Stores," Computing in Economics and Finance 2005 348, Society for Computational Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:sce:scecf5:348

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Orphanides, Athanasios & van Norden, Simon, 2005. "The Reliability of Inflation Forecasts Based on Output Gap Estimates in Real Time," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 37(3), pages 583-601, June.
    2. Marianne Baxter & Robert G. King, 1999. "Measuring Business Cycles: Approximate Band-Pass Filters For Economic Time Series," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 81(4), pages 575-593, November.
    3. Athanasios Orphanides & Simon van Norden, 2002. "The Unreliability of Output-Gap Estimates in Real Time," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 84(4), pages 569-583, November.
    4. Robert J. Gordon, 1997. "The Time-Varying NAIRU and Its Implications for Economic Policy," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 11(1), pages 11-32, Winter.
    5. Piyabha Kongsamut & Sergio Rebelo & Danyang Xie, 2001. "Beyond Balanced Growth," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 68(4), pages 869-882.
    6. Clark, Todd E. & McCracken, Michael W., 2001. "Tests of equal forecast accuracy and encompassing for nested models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 85-110, November.
    7. Christensen, Laurits R & Jorgenson, Dale W & Lau, Lawrence J, 1973. "Transcendental Logarithmic Production Frontiers," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 55(1), pages 28-45, February.
    8. Pesaran, M Hashem & Timmermann, Allan, 1992. "A Simple Nonparametric Test of Predictive Performance," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 10(4), pages 561-565, October.
    9. Hodrick, Robert J & Prescott, Edward C, 1997. "Postwar U.S. Business Cycles: An Empirical Investigation," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 29(1), pages 1-16, February.
    10. Diebold, Francis X & Mariano, Roberto S, 2002. "Comparing Predictive Accuracy," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 20(1), pages 134-144, January.
    11. St-Amant, P. & van Norden, S., 1997. "Measurement of the Output Gap: A Discussion of Recent Research at the Bank of Canada," Technical Reports 79, Bank of Canada.
    12. Tommaso Proietti & Alberto Musso & Thomas Westermann, 2007. "Estimating potential output and the output gap for the euro area: a model-based production function approach," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 85-113, July.
    13. Camba-Mendez, Gonzalo & Rodriguez-Palenzuela, Diego, 2003. "Assessment criteria for output gap estimates," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 529-562, May.
    14. Bentolila Samuel & Saint-Paul Gilles, 2003. "Explaining Movements in the Labor Share," The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 1-33, October.
    15. Jean-Philippe Cayen & Simon van Norden, 2002. "La fiabilité des estimations de l'écart de production au Canada," Staff Working Papers 02-10, Bank of Canada.
    16. Harvey, David & Leybourne, Stephen & Newbold, Paul, 1997. "Testing the equality of prediction mean squared errors," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 281-291, June.
    17. Hamilton, James D., 1986. "A standard error for the estimated state vector of a state-space model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 387-397, December.
    18. Jane Haltmaier, 1996. "Inflation-adjusted potential output," International Finance Discussion Papers 561, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    19. Rünstler, Gerhard, 2002. "The information content of real-time output gap estimates, an application to the euro area," Working Paper Series 0182, European Central Bank.
    20. Paula De Masi, 1997. "IMF Estimates of Potential Output; Theory and Practice," IMF Working Papers 97/177, International Monetary Fund.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    Money; behavioral finance; payment systems;

    JEL classification:

    • E42 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Money and Interest Rates - - - Monetary Sytsems; Standards; Regimes; Government and the Monetary System
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • D01 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sce:scecf5:348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.