IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Evaluating Business Cycle Models with Labor Market Search

Listed author(s):
  • Robert M. Hussey

Incorporating labor market search in general equilibrium models has been shown to generate realistic dynamics in employment, job creation, and job destruction and to increase the magnitude and persistence of the impact of productivity shocks on output. This paper studies the extent to which the empirical successes of those models are dependent upon specifications of the matching technology that can exaggerate the level of unemployment, making possible large employment flows in response to business cycle shocks. Even with a more strict definition of unemployment and a less constrained flow of workers into new employment, models with labor market search are still found to generate larger and more persistent propagation of productivity shocks than do traditional real business cycle models. However, the respecification of the job turnover process reduces the size of those effects. Policy experiments find that subsidizing job creation can lead to small reductions in output's response to a negative productivity shock, but it reduces steady state output and consumption and increases unemployment and the volatility of output. Taxing job destruction the opposite effects.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by Society for Computational Economics in its series Computing in Economics and Finance 2001 with number 134.

in new window

Date of creation: 01 Apr 2001
Handle: RePEc:sce:scecf1:134
Contact details of provider: Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sce:scecf1:134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.