IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluating Real Business Cycle Models Using Likelihood Methods


  • John Landon-Lane

    (The University of New South Wales)


One of the biggest issues in using likelihood methods to evaluate and compare Real Business Cycle models is the lack of stochastic components, or lack of dimensionality, in the models. There have been a number of approaches to remedy this problem. One method is to add stochastic elements such as measurement errors to the model so that there are as many stochastic terms in the model as variables. Another approach is to compute the likelihood using only subsets of variables at a time.This paper describes a method that directly computes a likelihood function for an RBC model, via its state-space representation, using all of the information available without having to add arbitrary stochastic elements. The state-space representation for the model is obtained using a linear-quadratic approximation. In the state-space representation all of the variables are represented as linear functions of the state variables. The state variables include the stochastic elements of the model. Independent indices of the variables are then used to compute the likelihood function thus allowing for information from all of the variables in the modle to be use in computing the likelihood function. The independent indices are computed using a canonical decomposition procedure. It is shown how this method can be extended to the problem where the relationship between the state variables and the observed variables are non-linear. A standard RBC model is evaluated and the linear and non-linear case is compared.Once a full dimensional likelihood function is calculated it is possible to use Bayesian non-nested model comparison techniques to compare RBC and non-RBC models directly. It is also possible to directly compare non-nested models across sub-samples of the data as well as across the whole sample. This paper shows how these procedures can be implemented using standard Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques.

Suggested Citation

  • John Landon-Lane, 2000. "Evaluating Real Business Cycle Models Using Likelihood Methods," Computing in Economics and Finance 2000 309, Society for Computational Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:sce:scecf0:309

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Dibartolomeo, Giovanni & Rossi, Lorenza & Tancioni, Massimiliano, 2004. "Monetary Policy under Rule-of-Thumb Consumers and External Habits: An International Empirical Comparison," MPRA Paper 1094, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Jun 2006.
    2. Giovanni Di Bartolomeo & Lorenza Rossi & Massimiliano Tancioni, 2007. "Monetary Policy under Rule-of-Thumb Consumers and External Habits," Money Macro and Finance (MMF) Research Group Conference 2006 1, Money Macro and Finance Research Group.
    3. Frank Smets & Raf Wouters, 2003. "An Estimated Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model of the Euro Area," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 1(5), pages 1123-1175, September.
    4. Giovanni Di Bartolomeo & Lorenza Rossi & Massimiliano Tancioni, 2011. "Monetary policy, rule-of-thumb consumers and external habits: a G7 comparison," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(21), pages 2721-2738.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sce:scecf0:309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.