IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sce/scecf0/299.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Learning-Induced Securities Price Volatility

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Bossaerts

Abstract

This paper tests whether the high average returns on the S&P 500 index in recent history can be attributed to mistaken expectations (the ex-ante risk premium -- taken to be constant -- is systematically less than the ex-post measured risk premium), or, alternatively, whether can they be explained as the result of selection bias (the U.S. experience is exceptional). The tests reject these hypotheses over the periods 1/81 to 12/97 (p = 0.02), and 1/41-12/60 (p = 0.03). They do not reject over the periods 1/28-12/40 and 1/61-12/80. The tests are based on a bound that the ex-post Sharpe ratios impose on the volatility of the ratio of the market's prior and posterior beliefs about future outcomes. The bound derives from a property of Bayesian learning first noted in an earlier paper. Qualitatively, for the bound not to be violated, higher absolute mean excess returns may need to be accompanied with higher volatility. This should be interpreted as predicting that large price movements (positive as well as negative) may have to be erratic. We confirm this prediction for the S&P 500 data.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Bossaerts, 2000. "Learning-Induced Securities Price Volatility," Computing in Economics and Finance 2000 299, Society for Computational Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:sce:scecf0:299
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Larry G. Epstein & Martin Schneider, 2007. "Learning Under Ambiguity," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 74(4), pages 1275-1303.
    2. Massa, Massimo & Simonov, Andrei, 2005. "Is learning a dimension of risk?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(10), pages 2605-2632, October.
    3. Larry G. Epstein & Martin Schneider, 2008. "Ambiguity, Information Quality, and Asset Pricing," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 63(1), pages 197-228, February.
    4. Consiglio, Andrea & Russino, Annalisa, 2007. "How does learning affect market liquidity? A simulation analysis of a double-auction financial market with portfolio traders," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 1910-1937, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sce:scecf0:299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/sceeeea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.