IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sad/wpaper/181.html

Relaxing the Biological Clock: Can More Time Reduce Fertility?

Author

Listed:
  • Martín Rossi

    (Universidad de San Andrés)

Abstract

Egg freezing relaxes the biological deadline associated with female fertility and is widely viewed as an empowering technology expected to increase lifetime fertility. This paper challenges that intuition. We develop a finite-horizon dynamic stopping model in which fertility initiation requires the simultaneous alignment of multiple, imperfectly persistent dimensions, including partnership quality, economic conditions, and personal readiness. Initiating childbearing is irreversible and occurs only when the joint realization of these evolving states exceeds an endogenous reservation threshold. By lowering the hazard of irreversible infertility, egg freezing increases the continuation value of waiting and raises this reservation standard. Individuals optimally become more selective. However, the technology insures only against biological decline, not against partnership instability or the tightening of other age-dependent constraints. When these dimensions do not improve with age, greater selectivity can delay initiation and reduce the probability of crossing the threshold within a finite horizon. As a result, relaxing the biological deadline can reduce fertility initiation and expected completed fertility in a non-empty region of parameters. We derive formal propositions and discuss empirical implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Martín Rossi, 2026. "Relaxing the Biological Clock: Can More Time Reduce Fertility?," Working Papers 181, Universidad de San Andres, Departamento de Economia, revised Feb 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:sad:wpaper:181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.udesa.edu.ar/pub/econ/doc181.pdf
    File Function: First version, February 2026
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J13 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
    • I15 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health and Economic Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sad:wpaper:181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Economia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/desanar.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.