IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rut/rutres/200624.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Constrained Tax Reform: How Political and Economic Constraints Affect the Formation of Tax Policy Proposals

Author

Listed:
  • Rosanne Altshuler

    () (Rutgers University, Department of Economics)

  • Jonathan Ackerman

    () (President's Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform)

Abstract

On November 1, 2005, the President’s Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform (the Panel) delivered its report to Treasury Secretary John W. Snow. The bipartisan Panel was organized ten months earlier by President George W. Bush to study options to reform the federal income tax system in ways that would make it simpler, fairer, and more growth-oriented. The Panel recommended two tax reform plans: the Simplified Income Tax Plan, which is based on the current income tax system, and the Growth and Investment Tax Plan, which incorporates a tax on business activity that is similar to some consumption tax prototypes. Many aspects of the Panel’s recommended plans were greeted with praise. However, a number of commentators criticized the reform options because they did not incorporate reductions in statutory rates on a scale comparable to TRA86. This paper discusses how the economic and political constraints faced by the Panel presented different challenges than the 1986 reform effort and resulted in a substantially different approach to tax reform. We draw two conclusions that help explain the Panel proposals and should provide guidance for future reform efforts. First, the tax system as it has evolved over the last 20 years greatly shaped the Panel’s recommendations. Structural features of the current tax system, such as the AMT, phase-outs, and numerous expiring provisions, make it difficult to fashion tax reform plans that are likely to generate popular support based on rate reductions alone. Second, the constraints likely to be imposed on tax reform are different, and in many ways more politically difficult, than those faced by tax reformers during the 1980s. These forces create tradeoffs that make reducing tax rates less politically tenable than past efforts and, ultimately, affect the ability to garner popular support for tax reform.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosanne Altshuler & Jonathan Ackerman, 2006. "Constrained Tax Reform: How Political and Economic Constraints Affect the Formation of Tax Policy Proposals," Departmental Working Papers 200624, Rutgers University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:rut:rutres:200624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rosanne Altshuler & Robert Dietz, 2008. "Reconsidering Tax Expenditure Estimation: Challenges And Reforms," Departmental Working Papers 200804, Rutgers University, Department of Economics.
    2. Rosanne Altshuler & Robert D. Dietz, 2008. "Tax Expenditure Estimation and Reporting: A Critical Review," NBER Working Papers 14263, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Altshuler, Rosanne & Dietz, Robert, 2011. "Reconsidering Tax Expenditure Estimation," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 64(2), pages 459-489, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    political economy; tax reform;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rut:rutres:200624. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/derutus.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.