IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rug/rugwps/13-846.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How participation in the strategy development process impacts managers’ creation of budgetary slack

Author

Listed:
  • J. DE BAERDEMAEKER
  • W. BRUGGEMAN

Abstract

This paper explores the impact of participation in the strategy development process on managers’ creation of budgetary slack. It is proposed that a participative strategy development process affects budgetary slack through the mediating effect of the managers’ autonomous motivation to attain the required budget targets and their affective organizational commitment. Data obtained from 247 Belgian managers are used to test the proposed model. Results from a structural equation model suggest that increased participation in strategy development fosters autonomous motivation toward budget targets and affective commitment toward the organization. In turn, autonomous motivation and affective organizational commitment are negatively related to the creation of budgetary slack. These findings highlight the importance of participation in the strategy development process in advancing our understanding of the complex budgetary slack process. A participative strategy development process appears key in controlling budgetary slack when it is deemed dysfunctional for the organization. The results also provide evidence of the importance of distinguishing among different types of motivation: only the effect of autonomous motivation on budgetary slack is significant whereas controlled motivation seems to have no effect.

Suggested Citation

  • J. De Baerdemaeker & W. Bruggeman, 2013. "How participation in the strategy development process impacts managers’ creation of budgetary slack," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 13/846, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
  • Handle: RePEc:rug:rugwps:13/846
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wps-feb.ugent.be/Papers/wp_13_846.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rug:rugwps:13/846. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nathalie Verhaeghe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ferugbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.