IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Long-Term Evolution of Quality of Life for Breast Cancer Treated Patients


  • M. NEYT





Life is not just a matter of length but of depth and quality as well. The effect of treatment on quality of life (QoL) is important at all stages of the patient’s treatment. However, relatively little is known about the long-term evolution of QoL for breast cancer treated patients. To systematically analyse long-term (LT) QoL we made a distinction between short-, medium- and long-term survivals. Through a questionnaire, we gathered information on treatment, general health, activity problems, disease symptoms, pain, emotions, work, social activities, self care, housekeeping, sexuality, family and meaning of life. This broad questionnaire allowed us to analyse the evolution in QoL for different dimensions over three survival groups. We found that the longer the survival time, the more the QoL of breast cancer treated patients ameliorated. Rather surprisingly, patients treated more than five years ago assessed their actual health status as slightly better – however not statistically significant – than before diagnosis. Differences were found depending on the QoL related dimension and survival time. The scores on the emotional and meaning of life variables restored to initial levels in the longterm, while the lower scores on sexuality items remained more persistent. The longer the survival time, other factors such as ageing related problems influenced results.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Neyt & J. Albrecht, 2004. "The Long-Term Evolution of Quality of Life for Breast Cancer Treated Patients," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 04/255, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
  • Handle: RePEc:rug:rugwps:04/255

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item


    Breast cancer; Long-term evolution; Quality of life; Questionnaire;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rug:rugwps:04/255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Nathalie Verhaeghe). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.