Gradualism versus Big Bang: Evidence from Transition Countries
This paper uses previous empirical work to simulate the impact on real economic growth of the big bang and gradualist approaches to reform. Uncertainty concerning the appropriate reform steps introduces the possibility of reform reversals. We find that higher expected probabilities of reversal make policymakers more likely to opt for gradualism. Even relatively small probabilities are su.cient to tilt the balance in favour of gradualism. This is reinforced by shortsightedness of policymakers that follows from standard political cycles, but may be moderated by voter myopia.
|Date of creation:||Apr 2004|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Hoveniersberg 4, B-9000 Gent|
Phone: ++ 32 (0) 9 264 34 61
Fax: ++ 32 (0) 9 264 35 92
Web page: http://www.ugent.be/eb
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rug:rugwps:04/243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Nathalie Verhaeghe)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.