IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rug/rugwps/04-233.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Functional Size Measurement Method for Object-Oriented Conceptual Schemas: Design and Evaluation Issues

Author

Listed:
  • S. ABRAHÃO
  • G. POELS

    ()

  • O. PASTOR

Abstract

Functional Size Measurement (FSM) methods are intended to measure the size of software by quantifying the functional user requirements of the software. The capability to accurately quantify the size of software in an early stage of the development lifecycle is critical to software project managers for evaluating risks, developing project estimates and having early project indicators. In this paper we present OO-Method Function Points (OOmFP), a new FSM method for object-oriented systems that is based on measuring conceptual schemas. OOmFP is presented following the steps of a process model for software measurement. Using this process model we present the design of the measurement method, its application in a case study, and the analysis of different evaluation types that can be carried out to validate the method and to verify its application and results.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Abrahão & G. Poels & O. Pastor, 2004. "Functional Size Measurement Method for Object-Oriented Conceptual Schemas: Design and Evaluation Issues," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 04/233, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
  • Handle: RePEc:rug:rugwps:04/233
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wps-feb.ugent.be/Papers/wp_04_233.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Conceptual Modeling; Object Orientation; Software Measurement; Functional Size Measurement; Measure Validation; Measurement Verification.;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rug:rugwps:04/233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Nathalie Verhaeghe). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/ferugbe.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.