IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rtv/ceisrp/561.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Are Anti-Federalism and Republicanism the Way Forward for a United States of Europe? Lessons from American History

Author

Listed:

Abstract

Today, the European Union (EU) and in particular its common currency area created in 1998, the Eurozone, is going through an economic crisis that, given its duration, can be defined as structural and enduring and is such as to put the common political project at risk. This article retraces the history of the United States of America with the purpose of studying what lessons and insights for European Union evolution can be learned from the original debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists and from its repercussions on United States federal development to date. We also deal critically with some conflicting ideas about the organization and future of Europe and present some policy proposals to relaunch the European project based on some of the lessons learned from the history of the United States. We argue that the intuitions of the Anti-Federalists and Republicans can guide us in defining a path for the future of Europe. Given the ultimately (partially) successful but gradual experience of the United States, we suggest that it is necessary to hand back to the EU member countries, after the repeated failures of the EU Stability and Growth Path and Fiscal Compact, full control of their fiscal policy to build a ‘light’ fiscal federalism

Suggested Citation

  • Dandan Hong & Lorenzo Pecchi & Gustavo Piga, 2023. "Are Anti-Federalism and Republicanism the Way Forward for a United States of Europe? Lessons from American History," CEIS Research Paper 561, Tor Vergata University, CEIS, revised 07 Jul 2023.
  • Handle: RePEc:rtv:ceisrp:561
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ceistorvergata.it/RePEc/rpaper/RP561.pdf
    File Function: Main text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Anti-Federalism; Republicanism; Solidarity; Civil War; New Deal; Great Society; fiscal federalism; European Union;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rtv:ceisrp:561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Barbara Piazzi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csrotit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.