IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rsc/rsceui/2020-46.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

EU-China Trade-Related Dialogues, a first assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Weinian Hu
  • Jacques Pelkmans

Abstract

EU/China bilateral trade policy is largely conducted via a myriad of ‘trade-related’ Dialogues, nearly 50. Both the sheer quantity and the scope are conspicuous. We undertake a first attempt to map and assess these EU/China Dialogues, as far as is possible given the lack of transparency and paucity of hard data. We identify seven functions of the Dialogues. Four key questions are posed: (1) can the web of bilateral Dialogues be seen as an ‘unbundled’ FTA? (not really) ; (2) can Dialogues improve or delay market access? (if not about applied tariffs, both can be found, but easier access may well dominate because of the ‘lesser restrictions’ approach via Chinese reforms stimulated via Dialogues) ; (3) can Dialogues stimulate ‘sustainable development’, both socially and in environment & climate ? (yes, in both) ; (4) can Dialogues address ‘systemic differences’ ? (surely not directly, but in roundabout ways via reforms, selectively).

Suggested Citation

  • Weinian Hu & Jacques Pelkmans, 2020. "EU-China Trade-Related Dialogues, a first assessment," RSCAS Working Papers 2020/46, European University Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsc:rsceui:2020/46
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/67850/RSCAS_2020_46.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://hdl.handle.net/1814/67850
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    EU-China trade policy ; EU-China economic cooperation ; sustainable development ; bilateral dialogues;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsc:rsceui:2020/46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RSCAS web unit (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rsiueit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.