IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rom/km2013/10.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Perspectives On The Need Of Improving Parliamentary Control Over National Security In Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Anca-Cristina GRECEA

    („Mihai Viteazul” National Intelligence Academy)

Abstract

The evolution of democratic state in Romania, dynamics and multitude of risks and threats to the security climate generated analysis and public debate topics relevant for political class and civil society, which determines, concomitant with the efficiency of the institutions’ activity in the security field, also an improvement of mechanisms of parliamentary control over them.Parliamentary control over the security sector is performed more or less effectively depending on the power of Parliament in relation to Government and the institutions from national security field. This power derives not only from Constitution and the legal framework of the organization and functioning of institutions from the national security field, but also from the rules of parliamentary procedure and from the practices established and improved over time, depending on the social-cultural characteristics of a nation, but especially on the security climate which these institutions are obliged to ensure it at optimum parameters

Suggested Citation

  • Anca-Cristina GRECEA, 2013. "Perspectives On The Need Of Improving Parliamentary Control Over National Security In Romania," Proceedings of the 8-th International Conference on Knowledge Management: Projects, Systems and Technologies, Bucharest, November 7-8, 2013. 10, Faculty of Economic Cybernetics, Statistics and Informatics, Academy of Economic Studies from Bucharest and "Carol I-st" National Defence University, Department for Management of the Defence Resources and Education.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:km2013:10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccasp.ase.ro/KM2013/10.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    national security; parliamentary control; civil society; mass-media;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:km2013:10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mogos Radu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.