IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rom/km2010/34.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Quantitative Methods In Research Projects Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Narcisa CIOBOTAR

    () (Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest)

  • Constantin MITRUÞ

    (Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest)

Abstract

In this paper it proposed an indicators system for scientific research performance ex-post evaluation based on results indicators. This approach ensures the integration of indicators system in policy and strategy R&D and Innovation. The paper is based on case study developed for Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Narcisa CIOBOTAR & Constantin MITRUÞ, 2010. "Quantitative Methods In Research Projects Assessment," Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Knowledge Management: Projects, Systems and Technologies,Bucharest, November 12-13 2010 34, Faculty of Economic Cybernetics, Statistics and Informatics, Academy of Economic Studies and National Defence University "Carol I", Department for Management of the Defence Resources and Education.
  • Handle: RePEc:rom:km2010:34
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ccasp.ase.ro/KM2010/34.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Camelia DELCEA & Maria-Iuliana DASCÃLU,, 2009. "Knowledge Strategies Tools For Managing Enterprise Crisis," Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Knowledge Management: Projects, Systems and Technologies,Bucharest, November 6-7 2009 25, Faculty of Economic Cybernetics, Statistics and Informatics, Academy of Economic Studies and National Defence University "Carol I", DEPARTMENT FOR MANAGEMENT OF THE DEFENCE RESOURCES AND EDUCATION.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Scientific production; indicators system; methodology; evaluation; performance.;

    JEL classification:

    • C10 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:km2010:34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Mogos Radu). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/feasero.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.