IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rnp/wpaper/w2022059.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The research of pricing mechanisms of public procurement system in the Russian Federation
[Исследование Вопросов Ценообразования В Государственных Закупках В Российской Федерации]

Author

Listed:
  • S.G. Belev

    (The Russian Presidential Academy Of National Economy And Public Administration)

  • A.G. Efremov

    (The Russian Presidential Academy Of National Economy And Public Administration)

  • A.G. Efremov

    (The Russian Presidential Academy Of National Economy And Public Administration)

  • A.V. Kireeva

    (The Russian Presidential Academy Of National Economy And Public Administration)

  • A.B. Zolotareva

    (The Russian Presidential Academy Of National Economy And Public Administration)

  • E.O. Matveev

    (The Russian Presidential Academy Of National Economy And Public Administration)

  • I.A. Sokolov;

    (The Russian Presidential Academy Of National Economy And Public Administration)

  • Komarnitskaya A. N.

    (The Russian Presidential Academy Of National Economy And Public Administration)

  • O.V. Suchkova.

    (The Russian Presidential Academy Of National Economy And Public Administration)

Abstract

This article presents the main results of research on the topic of the research of the pricing mechanisms within the public procurement system in the Russian Federation. The goal of this article is to estimate the effect of the pricing mechanism on the efficiency of public procurement system in the Russian Federation. This research examines the initial maximum contract price (IMCP) mechanism as one possible reason for persistent inefficiency of the public procurement system. The authors discuss composite auctions (in which the winner is selected based on more than just price criteria) in the procurement of the results of research and development (R&D) work in Russia. It is found that unscrupulous customers can collude with suppliers to manipulate (overstate) the IMCP and restrict competition, which results in a higher final contract price and losses to the state budget. Using the metric of interaction frequency, we identified suppliers potentially affiliated with the customers. The results of econometric modeling suggest that potentially affiliated suppliers win the auctions with bids closer to the initial maximum contract price (IMCP) than independent suppliers. This result is observed regardless of specification changes and different evaluation methods. Potentially affiliated bidders have higher quality scores in contests with potentially affiliated organizers. At the same time, independent participants receive lower scores in such auctions. Therefore, a potentially affiliated bidder can set a higher price, winning due to overstated quality criteria.

Suggested Citation

  • S.G. Belev & A.G. Efremov & A.G. Efremov & A.V. Kireeva & A.B. Zolotareva & E.O. Matveev & I.A. Sokolov; & Komarnitskaya A. N. & O.V. Suchkova., 2021. "The research of pricing mechanisms of public procurement system in the Russian Federation [Исследование Вопросов Ценообразования В Государственных Закупках В Российской Федерации]," Working Papers w2022059, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:w2022059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/wpaper/w2022059.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    vertical collusion; public procurement; composite auctions; R&D; affiliation; quality criterion; tobit regression; federal public procurement system; initial maximum contract price.;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:w2022059. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.