IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rnp/wpaper/042036.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Methodological audit of monitoring social research
[Методический Аудит Мониторинговых Социальных Исследований]

Author

Listed:
  • Rogozin, Dmitriy (Рогозин, Дмитрий)

    (The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • Ipatova, Anna (Ипатова, Анна)

    (The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

Abstract

The preprint was written based on the results of research work carried out by the Social Research Methodology Laboratory of the Institute for Social Analysis and Forecasting, RANEPA under the President of the Russian Federation in 2019. The paper discusses the theoretical foundations for a methodological audit, the conduct of which is seen by the authors as the central, fundamental task of methodological work. The purpose of the methodological audit is not so much to search for fabrications and falsifications, but to assess systematic biases associated with the interviewer's effect, the level of refusals and the quality of the questionnaire, to obtain additional interpretations of the obtained distributions, which will ultimately lead to an increase in the quality of the information collected. The work is of interest to specialists and experts in the field of measuring public opinion, will be useful to students of sociological and marketing specialties, as well as to everyone interested in the methodology of mass polls.

Suggested Citation

  • Rogozin, Dmitriy (Рогозин, Дмитрий) & Ipatova, Anna (Ипатова, Анна), 2020. "Methodological audit of monitoring social research [Методический Аудит Мониторинговых Социальных Исследований]," Working Papers 042036, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:042036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/wpaper/042036.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:042036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.