IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Emerging Market Bank Rescues in an Era of Finance-Led Neoliberalism

Listed author(s):
  • Thomas Marois

In the current conjuncture, the international community is gripped by the problem of how to mitigate the impact of financial crisis on emerging markets while curbing the drift towards protectionism. The historical experiences of Mexico and Turkey in this regard are instructive. Both banking sectors have suffered harsh crises since the mid 1990s, were rescued, and then restructured without closing off their economies. To date, liberal and institutional political economic analyses of emerging market have mostly framed the problem with principal reference to crisis and the formal market-enhancing institutions of banking. The debates have then revolved around how either greater or lesser exposure to financial imperatives can improve stability and resolve developmental challenges. By and large, these debates have not addressed the problem of bank rescues and the underlying social relations of power that shape changes to the institutions of banking. The following, by contrast, compares Mexico�s 1995 and Turkey�s 2001 bank rescues from a historical materialist framework. Therein, the rescues are interpreted as historical processes that have revamped preexisting institutionalized sets of social power relations. Above all else, the impact of banking crisis-driven rescues has meant the historicalstructural deepening of financial imperatives in Mexican and Turkish society. This has had the socio-political consequence of reinforcing the power of finance and further eroding once legitimate channels of popular influence over national development. The experiences of Mexico and Turkey have implications for the international community�s response to the current world financial crisis.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Research on Money and Finance in its series Discussion Papers with number 09.

in new window

Date of creation: 2009
Handle: RePEc:rmf:dpaper:09
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rmf:dpaper:09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.