IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ris/sphedp/2009_206.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Impozitare Progresivă Sau Cotă Unică?

Author

Listed:
  • Delia Catarama, Elena Padurean

    (Romanian Academy, Centre for Financial and Monetary Research Victor Slavescu)

Abstract

Dacă ne gândim la România, o ţară cu o administraţie dificilă, cu multiple proceduri birocratice inutile, cu o mare evaziune fiscală, nu putem să nu încercăm o comparaţie a celor două tipuri de impozitare a veniturilor, mai ales prin efectele pe care acestea le au asupra contribuabilului, dar şi asupra bugetului de stat. Cota unică de impozitare are o serie de avantaje şi introducerea ei a fost susţinută în mare parte de analiştii economici ai Societăţii Academice din România. Ei susţineau, înainte de introducerea cotei, că, odată aplicată, această metodă de impozitare ar ajunge să aducă mai mulţi bani pentru buget, dar şi o stare de echitate socială. Au existat şi există încă argumente pro şi contra cotei unice de impozitare.

Suggested Citation

  • Delia Catarama, Elena Padurean, 2010. "Impozitare Progresivă Sau Cotă Unică?," Papers 2009/206, Osterreichish-Rumanischer Akademischer Verein.
    • Handle: RePEc:ris:sphedp:2009_206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    impozitare progresiva; cota unica;

    JEL classification:

    • A11 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Role of Economics; Role of Economists

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:sphedp:2009_206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Brindusa Covaci (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ffuspro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.