IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ris/nepswp/2012_010.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Terrorist Signalling and the End of Violence

Author

Listed:
  • Ferguson, Neil T. N.

    () (DIW, Berlin)

Abstract

This paper revisits the signalling literature of the interactions between terrorist organisations and governments. It argues that the theoretical literature to date, and particularly the signalling literature, builds models from the very singular backdrop of transnational terrorist spectaculars. Accordingly, policy recommendations cannot be extended to a broader realm of terrorist threats. By inverting the nature of the signalling, flipping it from a violent act to a peaceful one, this paper more accurately represents the continued interactions between terrorists and governments. A Revolutionary organisation exists and engages with the Incumbent government in order to affect material change to some aspect of the status quo. The Revolutionary believes that violence action and, in some cases, peacemaking, can achieve these goals. The Incumbent is suspicious of the Revolutionary and cannot observe if the Revolutionary is committed to violence or uses it, only, as a political tool. In the first period, the Revolutionary uses a costly peacemaking signal, selected from a continuous set, in an attempt to reveal its type and intentions to the Incumbent. In the second stage, both players engage simultaneously, choosing to devote resources to joint peaceful interaction or unilateral violence. This model sets out conditions that support pooling equilibria in which the signalling phase is ineffective and a separating equilibrium where the structure of the Incumbent’s beliefs leads to differences in the Revolutionary’s equilibrium behaviour. Accordingly, this model supports outcomes where Incumbent’s beliefs and incentives can deter a nominally peaceful terrorist organisation for ceasing violence, whilst also providing a rational as to why political resolutions are the most common means to end terrorist conflicts.

Suggested Citation

  • Ferguson, Neil T. N., 2012. "Terrorist Signalling and the End of Violence," NEPS Working Papers 10/2012, Network of European Peace Scientists.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:nepswp:2012_010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.europeanpeacescientists.org/10_2012.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Le Breton, Michel & Weber, Shlomo, 2003. "Secession-Proof Cost Allocations and Stable Group Structures in Models of Horizontal Differentiation," IDEI Working Papers 210, Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse.
    2. Mohtadi, Hamid & Roe, Terry, 1998. "Growth, lobbying and public goods," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 453-473, August.
    3. Joan Esteban & Debraj Ray, 2001. "Social decision rules are not immune to conflict," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 59-67, March.
    4. Michel Le Breton & Shlomo Weber, 2003. "The Art of Making Everybody Happy: How to Prevent a Secession," IMF Staff Papers, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 50(3), pages 1-4.
    5. Stergios Skaperdas, 1996. "Contest success functions (*)," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 7(2), pages 283-290.
    6. Desmet, Klaus & Le Breton, Michel & Ortuno-Ortin, Ignacio, 2006. "Nation Formation and Genetic Diversity," IDEI Working Papers 133, Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse.
    7. Persson, Torsten & Tabellini, Guido, 1996. "Federal Fiscal Constitutions: Risk Sharing and Moral Hazard," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 64(3), pages 623-646, May.
    8. Rama, Martin & Tabellim, Guido, 1998. "Lobbying by capital and labor over trade and labor market policies," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(7), pages 1295-1316, July.
    9. Robert Fenge & Jakob von Weizsäcker, 2001. "How Much Fiscal Equalization? A Constitutional Approach," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 157(4), pages 623-623, December.
    10. Joan Esteban & Debraj Ray, 2006. "Inequality, Lobbying, and Resource Allocation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(1), pages 257-279, March.
    11. Matthew O. Jackson & Massimo Morelli, 2007. "Political Bias and War," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 97(4), pages 1353-1373, September.
      • Jackson, Matthew O. & Morelli, Massimo, "undated". "Political bias and war," Working Papers 1247, California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences.
    12. repec:cup:apsrev:v:95:y:2001:i:03:p:663-672_00 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Esteban, Joan & Ray, Debraj, 1999. "Conflict and Distribution," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 379-415, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Terrorism; domestic conflict; game theory; signalling; Northern Ireland; South Africa; Spain; transnational terrorism; domestic terrorism;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:nepswp:2012_010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Vincenzo Bove). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/nepssea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.