IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ris/kiepwp/2018_006.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Sources of Comparative Advantage in Services: Institution vs. Social Capital

Author

Listed:

Abstract

Previous studies that have identified the impacts of institutions or cultural traits on comparative advantage focused on goods trade, but not services trade. In contrast to the rapid increase in trade in services, empirical examination on sources of comparative advantage in services trade remains limited. This paper attempts to fill this gap by investigating empirically the impacts of institution as well as social capital on comparative advantage in services trade. Services are exposed to relatively more prechoice risks than goods, because it is difficult to obtain information on the quality of services before the consumer decides to purchase. In addition, trade in services involved in global value chains possibly takes on the risks of contract breach by other firms along the same value chains. As a result, the transaction risks for trade in services are higher than for trade in goods. Using the World Input Output Database, we estimate the importance of social capital for comparative advantage in services. We find that countries with more social capital tend to specialize in the production of contract-intensive services. We also find that social capital rather than institution matters for comparative advantage in services.

Suggested Citation

  • Choi, Nakgyoon & Park, Soonchan, 2018. "Sources of Comparative Advantage in Services: Institution vs. Social Capital," Working Papers 18-6, Korea Institute for International Economic Policy.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:kiepwp:2018_006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.kiep.go.kr/gallery.es?mid=a10105020000&bid=0001&list_no=2299&act=view&act=view&list_no=2299&cg_code=
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Services Trade; Comparative Advantage; Institution; Social Capital;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F11 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Neoclassical Models of Trade
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:kiepwp:2018_006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Juwon Seo (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/kieppkr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.