Author
Abstract
Supply chain disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the vulnerability of supply chains that are concentrated in certain countries around the world, and have led to policies prioritizing economic security and reducing dependence on certain countries. Major developed countries have been pursuing reshoring strategies to rebuild their domestic production base, while also aiming to establish reliable supply chains through “friend-shoring” with trusted partner countries. This recent movement of supply chain restructuring, summarized as geoeconomics fragmentation, has particularly intensified in strategic technology sectors related to security. While the Korean government's participation in friend-shoring policies by some developed countries is not intended to exclude China from supply chains, it is true that participating in cooperative frameworks with those countries may lead to worsening relations with China. As the U.S. continues to expand its efforts to restructure supply chains excluding China, it may prove difficult to deepen economic relations with China, which could lead to a decrease in Korea’s national interests. Against this backdrop, ASEAN holds high strategic value as a cooperative partner in the midst of the U.S.-China rivalry. ASEAN plays a central role in political, security, economic, and socio-cultural cooperation in the Indo-Pacific region through mechanisms like the East Asia Summit (EAS), ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF), ASEAN Defense Ministers' Meeting Plus (ADMM-Plus), and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). Through such mechanisms centered on ASEAN, it is expected that cooperation in East Asia can be sought without directly facing sensitive issues within the U.S.-China strategic competition. Therefore, this study attempted to explore ways to cooperate with ASEAN in the context of U.S.-China rivalry.
Suggested Citation
Meeryung La, 2024.
"ASEAN-Korea Cooperation in GVC amid US-China Rivalry,"
World Economy Brief
24-35, Korea Institute for International Economic Policy.
Handle:
RePEc:ris:kiepwe:2024_035
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:kiepwe:2024_035. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Geun Hye Son (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/kieppkr.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.