Forecast Pretesting and Correction
Sometimes it is suggested that end users can improve forecasts by some kind of corrections. At least implicitly, the idea is to use such corrections if the forecasts appear too inaccurate by some criteria. Alternative forecasts can be defined based on whether a preliminary test of forecast usefulness and a subsequent correction has been made. The mean squared errors as some such forecasts are studied using some recent results on inequality pretesting. Uncorrected forecasts are shown to perform reasonably well. The optimal minimax regret critical values for the preliminary tests are fairly high, implying that the hypothesis of forecast usefulness mostly should be accepted and uncorrected forecasts used.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
|Date of creation:||28 May 1990|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Lönnrotinkatu 4 B, FIN-00120 HELSINKI|
Phone: +358 (0)9 609 900
Fax: +358 (0)9 601 753
Web page: http://www.etla.fi/
More information through EDIRC
|Order Information:|| Email: |
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rif:dpaper:324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Kaija Hyvönen-Rajecki)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.