IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rff/report/rp-26-12.html

Friendshoring the Battery Supply Chain: Are the New Regulations Feasible?

Author

Listed:
  • Craig-Scheckman, Madeline
  • Keen, Trissanne
  • Zhang, Terry
  • Alavi, Sarasadat
  • Toman, Michael A.

    (Resources for the Future)

Abstract

Lithium iron phosphate batteries are important for storing intermittent renewable electricity and powering electric vehicles. This report assesses the extent to which the battery supply chain can be “friendshored,” now that clean energy tax credits are subject to stringent limits on involvement of “prohibited foreign entities.” This is not simply a matter of where materials are sourced: the regulated battery inputs also include manufacturing equipment, intellectual property, and technology licensing. The requirements are most problematic for the “midstream” segment of the supply chain—the processing of extracted critical minerals. “Upstream” (mineral extraction) and “downstream” (manufacture of battery components) inputs are less likely to be constrained. To be compliant, manufacturers must find new sources, scale up investment, and reduce dependence on technologies developed by prohibited foreign entities. Scenario analysis indicates that the supply chain is unlikely to be sufficiently friendshored before costly restrictions are triggered. Compliance timelines should reflect industrial realities in the sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Craig-Scheckman, Madeline & Keen, Trissanne & Zhang, Terry & Alavi, Sarasadat & Toman, Michael A., 2026. "Friendshoring the Battery Supply Chain: Are the New Regulations Feasible?," RFF Reports 26-12, Resources for the Future.
  • Handle: RePEc:rff:report:rp-26-12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rff.org/documents/5444/Report_26-12.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rff:report:rp-26-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Resources for the Future (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rffffus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.