IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rff/report/rp-26-04.html

How the US Environmental Protection Agency Got It Wrong About Monetizing Benefits of Air Pollution Regulations

Author

Listed:
  • Hubbell, Bryan

    (Resources for the Future)

  • Krupnick, Alan

    (Resources for the Future)

Abstract

The Trump administration’s US Environmental Protect Agency (EPA) has decided to stop quantifying and monetizing human health benefits when analyzing the impacts of federal regulations, overturning decades of established and peer-reviewed conventions. Instead, only the costs incurred by companies for complying with a regulation will be quantified when implementing regulatory decisions, leading to an unbalanced assessment of impacts. The EPA’s arguments for not quantifying and monetizing benefits are unsupported and out of step with the best available science and established practice. We provide a point-by-point rebuttal to these arguments and conclude that by failing to include quantified and monetized benefits in economic impact analysis, EPA has chosen to abandon adherence to economic principles, decades of guidance from experts, its own economic analysis guidelines, and guidance from the Office of Management and Budget.

Suggested Citation

  • Hubbell, Bryan & Krupnick, Alan, 2026. "How the US Environmental Protection Agency Got It Wrong About Monetizing Benefits of Air Pollution Regulations," RFF Reports 26-04, Resources for the Future.
    • Handle: RePEc:rff:report:rp-26-04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rff.org/documents/5163/Report_26-04_-_Update_2.3.26.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joseph Aldy & Matthew J. Kotchen & Mary Evans & Meredith Fowlie & Arik Levinson & Karen Palmer, 2021. "Cobenefits and Regulatory Impact Analysis: Theory and Evidence from Federal Air Quality Regulations," Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 2(1), pages 117-156.
    2. ., 2024. "Guidelines on teaching online classes," Chapters, in: Teaching Online Classes, chapter 1, pages 7-36, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. James E Bennett & Helen Tamura-Wicks & Robbie M Parks & Richard T Burnett & C Arden Pope III & Matthew J Bechle & Julian D Marshall & Goodarz Danaei & Majid Ezzati, 2019. "Particulate matter air pollution and national and county life expectancy loss in the USA: A spatiotemporal analysis," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Sushil & Sanjay Dhir, 2024. "Guidelines for Case Analysis," Springer Books, in: Strategic Management, chapter 0, pages 491-519, Springer.
    5. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 2024. "Guidelines for Preparing Economic Analyses," Environmental Economics Guidance Documents 348896, United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schreiber, Andrew & Evans, David & Marten, Alex & Wolverton, Ann & Davis, Wade, 2025. "Evaluating economy-wide impacts of complex regulations: A hybrid linking approach for detailed sector and CGE models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    2. Larchenko, M.A. & Zagidullin, R.R. & Palyulin, V.V. & Brilliantov, N.V., 2024. "Application of machine learning technique for a fast forecast of aggregation kinetics in space-inhomogeneous systems," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 653(C).
    3. Ruaa Al Juboori & Divya S. Subramaniam & Leslie Hinyard & J. S. Onésimo Sandoval, 2023. "Unveiling Spatial Associations between COVID-19 Severe Health Index, Racial/Ethnic Composition, and Community Factors in the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(17), pages 1-17, August.
    4. Sana Basheer & Haroon Rashid & Abdul Nasir & Rana Ali Nawaz, 2019. "Spatial and Temporal Variability Analysis of PM2.5 Concentration in Lahore City," Environmental Contaminants Reviews (ECR), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 2(1), pages 06-10, October.
    5. Shupeng Zhu & Michael Mac Kinnon & Andrea Carlos-Carlos & Steven J. Davis & Scott Samuelsen, 2022. "Decarbonization will lead to more equitable air quality in California," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    6. Aloys Prinz & David J. Richter, 2021. "Feinstaubbelastung und Lebenserwartung in Deutschland," AStA Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv, Springer;Deutsche Statistische Gesellschaft - German Statistical Society, vol. 15(3), pages 237-272, December.
    7. Natália Cristina de Oliveira & Pedro Balikian Júnior & Arnaldo Tenório da Cunha Júnior & Edson de Souza Bento & Josealdo Tonholo & Thiago Aquino & Filipe Antonio de Barros Sousa & Gustavo Gomes de Ara, 2023. "Environmental Planning and Non-Communicable Diseases: A Systematic Review on the Role of the Metabolomic Profile," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(14), pages 1-15, July.
    8. Cao, Jing & Ma, Rong, 2023. "Mitigating agricultural fires with carrot or stick? Evidence from China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    9. Annunziata Faustini & Marina Davoli, 2020. "Attributable Risk to Assess the Health Impact of Air Pollution: Advances, Controversies, State of the Art and Future Needs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-17, June.
    10. Relja, Ruffin & Ward, Philippa & Cook, Richard & Zhao, Anita Lifen, 2025. "Credit Dom(me)s, BNPL switches and debt subs: Experiences of pain and pleasure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    11. Wang, Shaobin & Ren, Zhoupeng & Liu, Xianglong & Yin, Qian, 2022. "Spatiotemporal trends in life expectancy and impacts of economic growth and air pollution in 134 countries: A Bayesian modeling study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    12. Hekmatpour, Peyman & Leslie, Carrie McLachlin, 2022. "Ecologically unequal exchange and disparate death rates attributable to air pollution: A comparative study of 169 countries from 1991 to 2017," OSF Preprints racms, Center for Open Science.
    13. Mark Colas & John M. Morehouse, 2022. "The environmental cost of land‐use restrictions," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 13(1), pages 179-223, January.
    14. Huan Wang & Zhenyu Chen & Pan Zhang, 2022. "Spatial Autocorrelation and Temporal Convergence of PM 2.5 Concentrations in Chinese Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-11, October.
    15. Sara Kaffashi, 2025. "The Economic Value of the Saltmarsh Habitat in the UK Using Benefit Transfer: A Methodology-Consistent Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-21, June.
    16. Kate Chilton & Otavio Campoe & Nicholas Allan & Hal Hinkle, 2025. "Increasing Carbon Sequestration, Land-Use Efficiency, and Building Decarbonization with Short Rotation Eucalyptus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-17, February.
    17. Philip M. Iannaccone & Rebecca J. Ryznar & Lon J. Van Winkle, 2024. "Genetics, Epigenetics, and the Environment: Are Precision Medicine, Provider Compassion, and Social Justice Effective Public Health Measures to Mitigate Disease Risk and Severity?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(11), pages 1-17, November.
    18. Pandey, Sujita & Hajizadeh, Mohammad & Kiadaliri, Ali, 2024. "The contributions of avoidable causes of death to gender gap in life expectancy and life disparity in the US and Canada: 2001–2019," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 347(C).
    19. repec:plo:pone00:0241166 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Jihwan Yang & Sungho Tae & Hyunsik Kim, 2021. "Technology for Predicting Particulate Matter Emissions at Construction Sites in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-14, December.
    21. repec:osf:osfxxx:racms_v1 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rff:report:rp-26-04. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Resources for the Future (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rffffus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.