IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rff/report/rp-23-04.html

The Mandatory Purchase Requirement: Origins and Effectiveness in Achieving NFIP Goals

Author

Listed:
  • Shabman, Leonard

    (Resources for the Future)

  • Kousky, Carolyn

    (Resources for the Future)

  • Lingle, Brett

Abstract

Congress created the flood insurance mandatory purchase requirement (MPR) in 1973 to encourage more communities to join the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and more households to purchase flood insurance.Greater participation in the program and take-up of flood insurance were desired to achieve three NFIP goals:reduce flood damages through adoption of NFIP-mandated floodplain management regulations in participating communities,limit increased spending on federal disaster aid by lowering flood damages and making insurance the primary tool for financial recovery, andimprove post-flood financial recovery by increasing the number of people with flood insurance.The MPR requires federally-backed or regulated lenders to require borrowers to purchase and maintain a flood insurance policy when they provide a mortgage in a 1% annual chance floodplain, as mapped by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It also requires those who receive federal assistance for property acquisition, construction, or repairs in a mapped 1% annual chance floodplain to purchase and maintain flood insurance or they will not be eligible for post-flood disaster assistance in the future.The MPR has been successful in stimulating community enrollment in the NFIP and adoption of NFIP-required floodplain management regulations. These regulations have reduced flood damages relative to what they might have been without the regulations. However, there are limits to the ability of these NFIP-required regulations to continue to reduce flood damages. Adoption of cost-effective flood risk management programs, responsive to future changes in flood hazard, will require intergovernmental actions beyond the MPR.Since most disaster aid is not directed to individuals (let alone their insurable property losses), expanding residential flood insurance take-up will do little to reduce federal disaster aid.The MPR increased take-up rates of flood insurance among those subject to the requirement, but the MPR does not apply to many households in areas subject to flooding. These include households with property that does not have a federally-regulated or federally-backed mortgage and households outside the 1% annual chance floodplain. Encouraging flood insurance purchase by these households will require changes to the MPR or new programs aimed at spurring voluntary purchase of flood insurance.

Suggested Citation

  • Shabman, Leonard & Kousky, Carolyn & Lingle, Brett, 2019. "The Mandatory Purchase Requirement: Origins and Effectiveness in Achieving NFIP Goals," RFF Reports 23-04, Resources for the Future.
  • Handle: RePEc:rff:report:rp-23-04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rff.org/documents/3790/Report_23-04.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kousky, Carolyn & Lingle, Brett & Kunreuther, Howard & Shabman, Leonard, 2019. "Moving the Needle on Closing the Flood Insurance Gap," RFF Issue Briefs 23-02, Resources for the Future.
    2. Carolyn Kousky, 2019. "The Role of Natural Disaster Insurance in Recovery and Risk Reduction," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 11(1), pages 399-418, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hangsuck Lee & Minha Lee & Jimin Hong, 2024. "Optimal insurance for repetitive natural disasters under moral hazard," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 143(3), pages 247-277, December.
    2. Belinda Storey & Sally Owen & Christian Zammit & Ilan Noy, 2024. "Insurance retreat in residential properties from future sea level rise in Aotearoa New Zealand," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(3), pages 1-21, March.
    3. Grover,Arti Goswami & Kahn,Matthew Edwin, 2024. "Firm Adaptation to Climate Risk in the Developing World," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10797, The World Bank.
    4. Kakuho Furukawa & Hibiki Ichiue & Noriyuki Shiraki, 2020. "How Does Climate Change Interact with the Financial System? A Survey," Bank of Japan Working Paper Series 20-E-8, Bank of Japan.
    5. Jose Cobian & Budy P. Resosudarmo & Alin Halimatussadiah & Susan Olivia, 2022. "Demand for index-based flood insurance in Jakarta, Indonesia," Departmental Working Papers 2022-12, The Australian National University, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics.
    6. Tim Philippi & Jörg Schiller, 2024. "Abandoning disaster relief and stimulating insurance demand through premium subsidies," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 91(2), pages 339-382, June.
    7. Graff Zivin, Joshua & Liao, Yanjun & Panassié, Yann, 2023. "How hurricanes sweep up housing markets: Evidence from Florida," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    8. Sahar Zavareh Hofmann, 2022. "Build Back Better and Long-Term Housing Recovery: Assessing Community Housing Resilience and the Role of Insurance Post Disaster," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, May.
    9. Liu, Xian & Noonan, Douglas, 2022. "Building underwater: Effects of community-scale flood management on housing development," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    10. Sitong Yang & Shouwei Li & Xue Rui & Tianxiang Zhao, 2024. "The impact of climate risk on the asset side and liability side of the insurance industry: evidence from China," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 1-51, June.
    11. Frances C. Moore, 2024. "Learning, Catastrophic Risk, and Ambiguity in the Climate-Change Era," NBER Chapters, in: Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy, volume 6, pages 140-168, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Yutaro Izumi & Hiroyuki Nakata & Yasuyuki Sawada & Kunio Sekiguchi, 2024. "Building Business Resilience to Disasters," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-1223, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    13. Ho, Anson T.Y. & Huynh, Kim P. & Jacho-Chávez, David T. & Vallée, Geneviève, 2023. "We didn’t start the fire: Effects of a natural disaster on consumers’ financial distress," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    14. Kento Komatsubara & Alexander Ryota Keeley & Shunsuke Managi, 2023. "Revisiting the Value of Various Ecosystems: Considering Spatiality and Disaster Concern," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, February.
    15. Bradt, Jacob T. & Kousky, Carolyn & Wing, Oliver E.J., 2021. "Voluntary purchases and adverse selection in the market for flood insurance," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    16. Nguyen, Ha Trong & Mitrou, Francis, 2025. "Fertility responses to tropical cyclones: Causal evidence and mechanisms," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    17. Kalfin & Sukono & Sudradjat Supian & Mustafa Mamat, 2022. "Insurance as an Alternative for Sustainable Economic Recovery after Natural Disasters: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, April.
    18. Susana Ferreira, 2024. "Extreme Weather Events and Climate Change: Economic Impacts and Adaptation Policies," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 16(1), pages 207-231, October.
    19. Shuyu Han & Minakshi Keeni & Katsuhito Fuyuki, 2024. "The relationship between disaster resilience and household food security in a disaster-prone area in Kumamoto prefecture, Japan," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(11), pages 10119-10140, September.
    20. Kakuho Furukawa & Hibiki Ichiue & Noriyuki Shiraki, 2025. "How Does Climate Change Interact with the Financial System?," Monetary and Economic Studies, Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan, vol. 43, pages 61-94, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rff:report:rp-23-04. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Resources for the Future (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rffffus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.