IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rff/report/rp-21-11.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Global Energy Outlook 2021: Pathways from Paris

Author

Listed:
  • Newell, Richard G.

    (Resources for the Future)

  • Raimi, Daniel

    (Resources for the Future)

  • Villanueva, Seth

    (Resources for the Future)

  • Prest, Brian C.

    (Resources for the Future)

Abstract

As parts of the world begin to recover from the COVID-19 pandemic, a fundamental shift in the global energy system is needed to avoid the worst impacts of climate change. Despite efforts by policymakers in some nations to stimulate a “green” recovery, far greater effort will be required to spur the scale and speed of technological change necessary to limit warming to 1.5° or 2° Celsius by 2100. In this annual report, we review and compare—on an apples-to-apples basis—recent long-term projections from some of the world’s leading energy institutions. These projections range widely from those that assume little to no change in energy and climate policies to those that lay out technological feasible yet politically challenging pathways to limit climate change, improve energy access, and reduce air pollution. This year’s report provides particular insight into the differences between pathways aligned with the 1.5° and 2° Celsius climate targets; the effects of COVID-19 on future population, GDP, and energy demand; and the energy intensity of the global economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Newell, Richard G. & Raimi, Daniel & Villanueva, Seth & Prest, Brian C., 2021. "Global Energy Outlook 2021: Pathways from Paris," RFF Reports 21-11, Resources for the Future.
  • Handle: RePEc:rff:report:rp-21-11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rff.org/documents/2993/RFF_GEO_2021_Report_1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Newell, Richard G. & Raimi, Daniel, 2020. "Global Energy Outlook Comparison Methods: 2020 Update," RFF Reports 20-06, Resources for the Future.
    2. Richard G. Newell & Stuart Iler, 2013. "The Global Energy Outlook," NBER Working Papers 18967, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luo, Kui & Dong, Runqiu & Li, Xujun & Peng, Zhiyong & Lu, Libo & Xu, Jialing & Jin, Hui & Guo, Liejin, 2025. "Thermodynamic and safety analysis for hydrogen production in a supercritical water gasification system of coal by multi-oxidizers distribution," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
    2. Akhtar, Muhammad Usman Saeed & Asfand, Faisal & Mishamandani, Arian Shabruhi & Mishra, Rakesh & Khan, M. Imran, 2025. "Hydrogen as a sustainable combustion fuel: Performance, challenges, and pathways for transition to low-carbon propulsion systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katherine Calvin & Shonali Pachauri & Enrica De Cian & Ioanna Mouratiadou, 2014. "The Effect of African Growth on Future Global Energy, Emissions, and Regional Development," Working Papers 2014.28, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    2. Raimi, Daniel & Zhu, Yuqi & Newell, Richard G. & Prest, Brian C., 2024. "Global Energy Outlook 2024: Peaks or Plateaus?," RFF Reports 24-06, Resources for the Future.
    3. Pietro Pandolfi & Ivan Notardonato & Sergio Passarella & Maria Pia Sammartino & Giovanni Visco & Paolo Ceci & Loretta De Giorgi & Virgilio Stillittano & Domenico Monci & Pasquale Avino, 2023. "Characteristics of Commercial and Raw Pellets Available on the Italian Market: Study of Organic and Inorganic Fraction and Related Chemometric Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(16), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Knaut, Andreas & Tode, Christian & Lindenberger, Dietmar & Malischek, Raimund & Paulus, Simon & Wagner, Johannes, 2016. "The reference forecast of the German energy transition—An outlook on electricity markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 477-491.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rff:report:rp-21-11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Resources for the Future (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rffffus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.