IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rff/report/rp-21-01.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Coal Communities in Transition: A Case Study of Colstrip, Montana

Author

Listed:
  • Raimi, Daniel

    (Resources for the Future)

  • Glaser, Rebecca
  • Roemer, Kelli

Abstract

Colstrip, Montana, is a small, isolated community that was established in the 1920s for the express purpose of mining coal. Later in the 20th century, the town became home to a large coal-fired power plant, which has since been the bedrock of the local economy. In 2020, however, two of the plant’s four units were retired, the future of the remaining two units is highly uncertain, and a history of groundwater contamination caused by coal ash poses additional challenges for future economic development. These issues, particularly the uncertainty over the plant’s future, have been exacerbated by the complex ownership structure of the plant, which has made it difficult for local leaders to establish a clear transition plan. Although state and federal policymakers have attempted to intervene, transition planning efforts to date have been ad hoc and not well coordinated. Colstrip’s experience highlights the importance of providing more certainty for communities in transition. It also suggests the need for more coordination among local, state, and federal stakeholders while providing more robust planning and transition support. Looking forward, isolated, resource-dependent communities like Colstrip will face considerable challenges in an energy transition. Federal and state policymakers can help create better outcomes by striving to provide more certainty along with technical and financial support to facilitate locally driven transition efforts.To read the full report, click "Download" above.

Suggested Citation

  • Raimi, Daniel & Glaser, Rebecca & Roemer, Kelli, 2021. "Coal Communities in Transition: A Case Study of Colstrip, Montana," RFF Reports 21-01, Resources for the Future.
  • Handle: RePEc:rff:report:rp-21-01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rff.org/documents/2805/RFF_Report_21-01_Colstrip_Case_Study.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rff:report:rp-21-01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Resources for the Future (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rffffus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.