IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rff/dpaper/dp-26-07.html

Costs and Benefits of Decommissioning Orphaned Oil and Gas Wells: Evidence from Six States

Author

Listed:
  • Raimi, Daniel

    (Resources for the Future)

  • Cilento, Christina

    (Resources for the Future)

Abstract

In 2021, the US federal government provided billions of dollars to decommission orphaned oil and gas well sites. This program was touted by federal policymakers from both major political parties as a “win-win” for the environmental and economic benefits it would provide. In this analysis, we examine the costs and benefits of that program using data from roughly 2,150 well sites across six states. We estimate the effects of this spending on employment, methane abatement, and property values. On average, decommissioning costs were roughly $67,000 per well site, but with wide variation. Nine sites exceeded $1 million, while five sites reported the lowest costs of just $1,000. Total costs were roughly $145 million, from property value increases and methane abatement ranging from roughly $30 million to $170 million under different assumptions. For the small number of wells where methane emissions were quantified, decommissioning costs exceeded the social benefits of methane abatement in 75 to 80 percent of cases. Our results should be interpreted with caution because of extensive data limitations and the sensitivity of results to key methodological assumptions. Prioritizing decommissioning for wells with the highest environmental impacts, such as high rates of methane emissions, would easily pass cost–benefit tests in most cases.

Suggested Citation

  • Raimi, Daniel & Cilento, Christina, 2026. "Costs and Benefits of Decommissioning Orphaned Oil and Gas Wells: Evidence from Six States," RFF Working Paper Series 26-07, Resources for the Future.
  • Handle: RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-26-07
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rff.org/documents/5325/WP_26-07_Updated_2026-05-18.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William Haden Chomphosy & Sofia Varriano & Luke H. Lefler & Varenya Nallur & Maureen R. McClung & Matthew D. Moran, 2021. "Ecosystem services benefits from the restoration of non-producing US oil and gas lands," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 4(6), pages 547-554, June.
    2. Max Harleman & Jeremy G. Weber & Daniel Berkowitz, 2022. "Environmental Hazards and Local Investment: A Half-Century of Evidence from Abandoned Oil and Gas Wells," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 9(4), pages 721-753.
    3. Zabel, Jeffrey E. & Guignet, Dennis, 2012. "A hedonic analysis of the impact of LUST sites on house prices," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 549-564.
    4. Janet Currie & Michael Greenstone & Enrico Moretti, 2011. "Superfund Cleanups and Infant Health," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(3), pages 435-441, May.
    5. Michelle Marcus, 2021. "Going Beneath the Surface: Petroleum Pollution, Regulation, and Health," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 13(1), pages 1-37, January.
    6. Gamper-Rabindran, Shanti & Timmins, Christopher, 2013. "Does cleanup of hazardous waste sites raise housing values? Evidence of spatially localized benefits," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 345-360.
    7. Timothy J. Bartik, 2015. "The Social Value of Job Loss and Its Effect on the Costs of U.S. Environmental Regulations," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 9(2), pages 179-197.
    8. Lucija Muehlenbachs & Elisheba Spiller & Christopher Timmins, 2016. "The Housing Market Impacts of Shale Gas Development: Corrigendum," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(2), pages 475-475, February.
    9. Mark Agerton & Siddhartha Narra & Brian Snyder & Gregory B. Upton, 2023. "Financial liabilities and environmental implications of unplugged wells for the Gulf of Mexico and coastal waters," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 8(5), pages 536-547, May.
    10. Kevin Haninger & Lala Ma & Christopher Timmins, 2017. "The Value of Brownfield Remediation," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 4(1), pages 197-241.
    11. Lucas W. Davis, 2015. "Policy Monitor—Bonding Requirements for U.S. Natural Gas Producers," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 9(1), pages 128-144.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Steve Gibbons & Stephan Heblich & Esther Lho & Christopher Timmins, 2016. "Fear of Fracking? The Impact of the Shale Gas Exploration on House Prices in Britain," SERC Discussion Papers 0207, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    2. Klemick, Heather & Mason, Henry & Sullivan, Karen, 2020. "Superfund cleanups and children’s lead exposure," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    3. Guignet, Dennis & Jenkins, Robin R. & Nolte, Christoph & Belke, James, 2023. "The External Costs of Industrial Chemical Accidents: A Nationwide Property Value Study," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    4. Guignet, Dennis & Jenkins, Robin & Ranson, Matthew & Walsh, Patrick J., 2018. "Contamination and incomplete information: Bounding implicit prices using high-profile leaks," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 259-282.
    5. Guignet, Dennis & Jenkins, Robin R. & Belke, James & Mason, Henry, 2023. "The property value impacts of industrial chemical accidents," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    6. Kitchens, Carl & Wallace, Cullen T., 2022. "The impact of place-based poverty relief: Evidence from the Federal Promise Zone Program," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    7. Cheng, Nieyan & Li, Minghao & Liu, Pengfei & Luo, Qianfeng & Tang, Chuan & Zhang, Wendong, 2024. "Pipeline incidents and property values," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    8. Raimi, Daniel & Barone, Aurora & Carley, Sanya & Foster, David & Grubert, Emily & Haggerty, Julia & Higdon, Jake & Kearney, Michael & Konisky, David & Michael, Jennifer & Michaud, Gilbert & Nabahe, Sa, 2021. "Policy Options to Enable an Equitable Energy Transition," RFF Reports 21-09, Resources for the Future.
    9. Lappi, Pauli, 2018. "Optimal clean-up of polluted sites," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 53-68.
    10. Basu, Sayahnika & Ketcham, Jonathan D. & Kuminoff, Nicolai V., 2025. "Environmental regulation, residential sorting, and pollution exposure among senior Americans," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    11. Yingdan Mei & Jixiang Qiu & Yueming Lucy Qiu & Pengfei Liu, 2024. "Estimation of Property Value Changes from Nearby Carbon Capture and Utilization Projects in China," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 87(10), pages 2717-2742, October.
    12. Justin Contat & Carrie Hopkins & Luis Mejia & Matthew Suandi, 2024. "When climate meets real estate: A survey of the literature," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 52(3), pages 618-659, May.
    13. Xun Fan & Mengdi Liu & Bing Zhang & Weicheng Zhang, 2024. "The Green Premium: Environmental Regulation, Environmental Risk and Property Value," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 87(5), pages 1061-1096, May.
    14. Cassidy, Alecia & Meeks, Robyn C. & Moore, Michael R., 2023. "Cleaning up the Great Lakes: Housing market impacts of removing legacy pollutants," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    15. Gazze, Ludovica, 2021. "The price and allocation effects of targeted mandates: Evidence from lead hazards," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    16. Wang, Xiaohan & Yang, Mengjun, 2024. "The effect of soil pollution information disclosure on housing prices," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    17. Marcus, Michelle & Mueller, Rosie, 2024. "Unregulated contaminants in drinking water: Evidence from PFAS and housing prices," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    18. Walsh, Patrick & Mui, Preston, 2017. "Contaminated sites and information in hedonic models: An analysis of a NJ property disclosure law," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 1-14.
    19. Mei, Yingdan & Qiu, Jixiang & Wu, Jialu & Meng, Lina, 2021. "Do residents care about urban dumps? Evidence from individual housing transaction data," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    20. Laura A. Bakkensen & Xiaozhou Ding & Lala Ma, 2019. "Flood Risk and Salience: New Evidence from the Sunshine State," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 85(4), pages 1132-1158, April.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-26-07. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Resources for the Future (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rffffus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.