IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rff/dpaper/dp-26-02.html

The Impact of the Conservation Reserve Program on Nearby Property Values

Author

Listed:
  • Wibbenmeyer, Matthew

    (Resources for the Future)

  • Liao, Yanjun (Penny)

    (Resources for the Future)

  • Drunkenmiller, Hannah
  • Iovanna, Richard

Abstract

Conservation programs are often viewed as competing with local economic activity, yet they may also generate environmental amenities for nearby communities. We estimate how land enrolled in the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP)—the largest US payments-for-ecosystem-services program—affects residential property values. Using nationwide field-level CRP data from 2012–2022 linked to home transactions, we apply a repeat-sales hedonic framework to identify how changes in nearby CRP land influence transaction prices of the same properties. We find that CRP enrollment produces meaningful appreciation of home values: a 10-hectare increase in CRP land within 1,000 meters raises home values by roughly 0.5 percent, with especially strong effects for land converted to tree cover. Placebo and robustness tests confirm that results are not driven by county-level economic trends or development pressure. Our estimates imply that CRP lands increase US residential property values by $48–68 million annually, highlighting local benefits beyond payments to participating landowners.Keywords: Payments for Ecosystem Services, Land Conservation, Environmental Amenities, Hedonic Pricing

Suggested Citation

  • Wibbenmeyer, Matthew & Liao, Yanjun (Penny) & Drunkenmiller, Hannah & Iovanna, Richard, 2026. "The Impact of the Conservation Reserve Program on Nearby Property Values," RFF Working Paper Series 26-02, Resources for the Future.
    • Handle: RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-26-02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rff.org/documents/5217/WP_26-02_-_Updated_2.19.26.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bengt T. Hyberg & Michael R. Dicks & Thomas Hebert, 1991. "Economic Impacts Of The Conservation Reserve Program On Rural Economies," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 21(1), pages 91-105, Spring.
    2. Robbin Shoemaker, 1989. "Agricultural Land Values and Rents under the Conservation Reserve Program," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 65(2), pages 131-137.
    3. JunJie Wu & Haixia Lin, 2010. "The Effect of the Conservation Reserve Program on Land Values," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 86(1), pages 1-21.
    4. Roback, Jennifer, 1982. "Wages, Rents, and the Quality of Life," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 90(6), pages 1257-1278, December.
    5. Liu, Yue & Yao, Shunbo & Lin, Ying, 2018. "Effect of Key Priority Forestry Programs on off-farm employment: Evidence from Chinese rural households," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 24-37.
    6. Aspelund, Karl M. & Russo, Anna, 2025. "Additionality and Asymmetric Information in Environmental Markets: Evidence from Conservation Auctions," 2025 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2025, Denver, CO 361138, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Hellerstein, Daniel M., 2017. "The US Conservation Reserve Program: The evolution of an enrollment mechanism," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 601-610.
    8. Kovacs, Kent & West, Grant & Nowak, David J. & Haight, Robert G., 2022. "Tree cover and property values in the United States: A national meta-analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liao, Yanjun (Penny) & Wibbenmeyer, Matthew & Drunkenmiller, Hannah & Iovanna, Richard & Thompson, Alexandra & Holmes, Brandon, 2026. "Conservation and Community: The Local Economic Impacts of the Conservation Reserve Program," RFF Reports 26-02, Resources for the Future.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liao, Yanjun (Penny) & Wibbenmeyer, Matthew & Drunkenmiller, Hannah & Iovanna, Richard & Thompson, Alexandra & Holmes, Brandon, 2026. "Conservation and Community: The Local Economic Impacts of the Conservation Reserve Program," RFF Reports 26-02, Resources for the Future.
    2. Assogba, Noel Perceval & Zhang, Daowei, 2022. "The conservation reserve program and timber prices in the southern United States," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    3. Nick Hanley & Simanti Banerjee & Gareth D. Lennox & Paul R. Armsworth, 2012. "How should we incentivize private landowners to ‘produce’ more biodiversity?," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 28(1), pages 93-113, Spring.
    4. Wu, JunJie & Weber, Bruce, 2012. "Implications of a Reduced Conservation Reserve Program," C-FARE Reports 156625, Council on Food, Agricultural, and Resource Economics (C-FARE).
    5. Mykel R. Taylor & Nathan P. Hendricks & Gabriel S. Sampson & Dillon Garr, 2021. "The Opportunity Cost of the Conservation Reserve Program: A Kansas Land Example," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(2), pages 849-865, June.
    6. Thilo W. Glebe, 2022. "The influence of contract length on the performance of sequential conservation auctions," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(2), pages 739-764, March.
    7. Reisig, Dawson & Mullan, Katrina & Hansen, Andrew & Powell, Scott & Theobald, David & Ulrich, Rachel, 2021. "Natural amenities and low-density residential development: Magnitude and spatial scale of influences," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    8. Mark Partridge & M. Rose Olfert & Alessandro Alasia, 2007. "Canadian cities as regional engines of growth: agglomeration and amenities," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 40(1), pages 39-68, February.
    9. Kangas, Johanna & Ollikainen, Markku, 2022. "A PES scheme promoting forest biodiversity and carbon sequestration," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    10. Hartwick, John, 2013. "The Law of Urban Growth and the Local Public Sector," Queen's Economics Department Working Papers 274624, Queen's University - Department of Economics.
    11. Colas, Mark & Saulnier, Emmett, 2023. "Vertical migration externalities," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    12. Kim, Dongsoo & Liu, Feng & Yezer, Anthony, 2009. "Do inter-city differences in intra-city wage differentials have any interesting implications?," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 203-209, November.
    13. Oliver Falck & Michael Fritsch & Stephan Heblich & Anne Otto, 2018. "Music in the air: estimating the social return to cultural amenities," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 42(3), pages 365-391, August.
    14. Haughwout, Andrew F., 1998. "Aggregate Production Functions, Interregional Equilibrium, and the Measurement of Infrastructure Productivity," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 216-227, September.
    15. repec:rri:wpaper:200803 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Rajko Tomaš, 2022. "Measurement of the Concentration of Potential Quality of Life in Local Communities," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 163(1), pages 79-109, August.
    17. Elliot Anenberg & Edward Kung, 2018. "Can More Housing Supply Solve the Affordability Crisis? Evidence from a Neighborhood Choice Model," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2018-035, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    18. Plantinga, Andrew J. & Détang-Dessendre, Cécile & Hunt, Gary L. & Piguet, Virginie, 2013. "Housing prices and inter-urban migration," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 296-306.
    19. Dekle, Robert & Eaton, Jonathan, 1999. "Agglomeration and Land Rents: Evidence from the Prefectures," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 200-214, September.
    20. Pablo D. Fajgelbaum & Edouard Schaal, 2020. "Optimal Transport Networks in Spatial Equilibrium," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(4), pages 1411-1452, July.
    21. Daniel C. Monchuk & John A. Miranowski & Dermot J. Hayes & Bruce A. Babcock, 2007. "An Analysis of Regional Economic Growth in the U.S. Midwest," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 29(1), pages 17-39.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-26-02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Resources for the Future (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rffffus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.