IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rff/dpaper/dp-25-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

To Buy an Electric Vehicle or Not? A Bayesian Analysis of Consumer Intent in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Lohawala, Nafisa

    (Resources for the Future)

  • Arshad Rahman, Mohammad

Abstract

The adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) is considered critical to achieving climate goals, yet it hinges on consumer interest. This study explores how public intent to purchase EVs relates to four unexamined factors (exposure to EV information, perceptions of EVs’ environmental benefits, views on government climate policy, and confidence in future EV infrastructure) while controlling for prior EV ownership, political affiliation, and demographic characteristics (age, gender, education, and geographic location). We use data from three nationally representative opinion polls by the Pew Research Center 2021 2023 and Bayesian techniques to estimate the ordinal probit and ordinal quantile models. Results from ordinal probit show that respondents who are well informed about EVs, perceive them as environmentally beneficial, or are confident in development of charging stations are more likely to express strong purchase interest, with covariate effects (CEs)−a metric rarely reported in EV research−of 10.2, 15.5, and 19.1 percentage points, respectively. In contrast, those skeptical of government climate initiatives are more likely to express no interest, by more than 10 percentage points. Prior EV ownership exhibits the highest CE (19.0–23.1 percentage points), and the impact of most demographic variables is consistent with the literature. The ordinal quantile models demonstrate significant variation in CEs across the distribution of purchase intent, offering insights beyond the ordinal probit model. We are the first to use quantile modeling to reveal how CEs differ significantly throughout the spectrum of purchase intent.Keywords: Decarbonization, electric vehicle, ordinal probit, Pew Research, quantile regression, technology adoption.

Suggested Citation

  • Lohawala, Nafisa & Arshad Rahman, Mohammad, 2025. "To Buy an Electric Vehicle or Not? A Bayesian Analysis of Consumer Intent in the United States," RFF Working Paper Series 25-16, Resources for the Future.
  • Handle: RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-25-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rff.org/documents/4887/WP_25-16.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sheldon, Tamara L. & Dua, Rubal & Alharbi, Omar Abdullah, 2023. "Electric vehicle subsidies: Time to accelerate or pump the brakes?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    2. Ivan Jeliazkov & Angela Vossmeyer, 2018. "The impact of estimation uncertainty on covariate effects in nonlinear models," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 1031-1042, September.
    3. Stephen P. Holland & Erin T. Mansur & Nicholas Z. Muller & Andrew J. Yates, 2016. "Are There Environmental Benefits from Driving Electric Vehicles? The Importance of Local Factors," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(12), pages 3700-3729, December.
    4. Hu, Xianfeng & Wang, Shanyong & Zhou, Rongting & Gao, Lan & Zhu, Zujun, 2023. "Policy driven or consumer trait driven? Unpacking the EVs purchase intention of consumers from the policy and consumer trait perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    5. Hsu, Chih-Wei & Fingerman, Kevin, 2021. "Public electric vehicle charger access disparities across race and income in California," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 59-67.
    6. Mamkhezri, Jamal, 2025. "Public preferences for battery electric vehicle policies considering energy mix: A US choice experiment study," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Hyunjung & Kim, Dae-Wook & Kim, Man-Keun, 2022. "Economics of charging infrastructure for electric vehicles in Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    2. Nafisa Lohawala & Mohammad Arshad Rahman, 2025. "To Buy an Electric Vehicle or Not? A Bayesian Analysis of Consumer Intent in the United States," Papers 2504.09854, arXiv.org.
    3. Yunhan Zheng & David R. Keith & Shenhao Wang & Mi Diao & Jinhua Zhao, 2024. "Effects of electric vehicle charging stations on the economic vitality of local businesses," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Sheldon, Tamara L. & Dua, Rubal, 2018. "Gasoline savings from clean vehicle adoption," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 418-424.
    5. Carsten Helm & Mathias Mier, 2020. "Steering the Energy Transition in a World of Intermittent Electricity Supply: Optimal Subsidies and Taxes for Renewables Storage," ifo Working Paper Series 330, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    6. Bialek, Sylwia & Gregory, Jack & Revesz, Richard L., 2022. "Still your grandfather's boiler: Estimating the effects of the Clean Air Act's grandfathering provisions," Working Papers 05/2022, German Council of Economic Experts / Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung.
    7. Kear, Sarah & Marangon Lima, Luana M. & Kittner, Noah, 2025. "Charging forward: A greenhouse gas emissions analysis of New York State's electric vehicle and clean energy goals," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    8. Kenneth T. Gillingham & Marten Ovaere & Stephanie M. Weber, 2025. "Carbon Policy and the Emissions Implications of Electric Vehicles," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 12(2), pages 313-352.
    9. Huang, Robert & Kahn, Matthew E., 2024. "An economic analysis of United States public transit carbon emissions dynamics," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    10. Zhang, Tong & Burke, Paul J. & Wang, Qi, 2024. "Effectiveness of electric vehicle subsidies in China: A three-dimensional panel study," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    11. Pascal Heid & Kevin Remmy & Mathias Reynaert, 2024. "Equilibrium Effects in Complementary Markets: Electric Vehicle Adoption and Electricity Pricing," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2024_615, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    12. Wang, Kunlun & Zheng, Leven J. & Lin, Boqiang, 2024. "Demand-side incentives, competition, and firms’ innovative activities: Evidence from automobile industry in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    13. Lee, Kyungho & Linton, Oliver & Whang, Yoon-Jae, 2023. "Testing for time stochastic dominance," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 352-371.
    14. Meunier, Guy & Ponssard, Jean-Pierre, 2020. "Optimal policy and network effects for the deployment of zero emission vehicles," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    15. Roberto Amaral-Santos & Ariaster Chimeli & Joao Paulo Pessoa, 2023. "Natural Gas Vehicles: Consequences to Fuel Markets and the Environment," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2023_07, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).
    16. Tamara L. Sheldon & Rubal Dua & Omar Abdullah Alharbib, 2023. "How Cost-effective are Electric Vehicle Subsidies in Reducing Tailpipe-CO2 Emissions? An Analysis of Major Electric Vehicle Markets," The Energy Journal, , vol. 44(3), pages 223-250, May.
    17. Jing Liang, Pengfei Liu, Yueming Qiu, Yi David Wang, and Bo Xing, 2020. "Time-of-Use Electricity Pricing and Residential Low-carbon Energy Technology Adoption," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 3), pages 1-38.
    18. Aldy, Joseph E. & Burtraw, Dallas & Fischer, Carolyn & Fowlie, Meredith & Williams, Roberton C. & Cropper, Maureen L., 2022. "How is the U.S. Pricing Carbon? How Could We Price Carbon?," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(3), pages 310-334, October.
    19. Patrick Bigler & Doina Maria Radulescu, 2022. "Environmental, Redistributive and Revenue Effects of Policies Promoting Fuel Efficient and Electric Vehicles," CESifo Working Paper Series 9645, CESifo.
    20. Adler, David & Severnini, Edson, 2023. "Timing matters: Intra-day shifts of economic activity and ambient ozone concentrations," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    decarbonization; electric vehicle; ordinal probit; pew research; quantile regression; technology adoption.;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-25-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Resources for the Future (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rffffus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.