IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/red/sed014/783.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Labor Market Friction, Firm Heterogeneity, and Aggregate Employment and Productivity

Author

Listed:
  • Dale Mortensen

    (Northwestern University)

  • Rasmus Lentz

    (University of Wisconsin-Madison)

Abstract

The paper is based on a synthesis of a "product variety" version of the firm life cycle model developed by Klette and Kortum (2004) and an equilibrium search model of the labor market with job to job flows introduced by Mortensen (2003). In the construction, a continuum of intermediate product and service varieties are produced with labor that serve as inputs in the production of a final good. Intermediate goods producers generally differ with respect to their productivity. New firms enter and continuing firms grow by developing new product varieties. The time required to match workers and jobs in the model depends on the total number of vacancies and possibly on the fraction of employed to unemployed worker. Workers receive job offers both while employed and unemployed. Wages are set through bargaining over marginal match surplus where the worker's bargaining position may improve with the arrival of outside job opportunities as in Dey and Flinn (2005) and Cahuc et al. (2006). A job separation occurs if either a worker quits or a job is destroyed. We show that a general equilibrium solution to the model exists and that the equilibrium is broadly consistent with observed dispersion in firm productivity, wages, and the relationship between them as well as patterns of worker flows. The model implies that frictions, both in the labor market and in the firm growth process, can be important determinants of aggregate productivity as well as aggregate employment.

Suggested Citation

  • Dale Mortensen & Rasmus Lentz, 2014. "Labor Market Friction, Firm Heterogeneity, and Aggregate Employment and Productivity," 2014 Meeting Papers 783, Society for Economic Dynamics.
  • Handle: RePEc:red:sed014:783
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:red:sed014:783. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christian Zimmermann (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sedddea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.