IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/red/sed013/539.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Explaining World Savings

Author

Listed:
  • Amartya Lahiri

    (University of British Columbia)

  • Colin Caines

    (University of British Columbia)

Abstract

Data on the world saving distribution reveals three key features: (i) saving rates are significantly different across countries and they remain different for long periods of time; (ii) the average saving rate has remained relatively unchanged but the dispersion in saving rates has risen; and (iii) some countries and regions have shown very sharp changes in their average saving rates over short periods of time. These facts are problematic for the standard model with time-additive preferences where the rate of time preference has to be equal for all countries. Without equal rates of time preference, the asymptotic distribution of world wealth is typically degenerate. This paper provides an alternative explanation for the observed saving patterns. We formalize a model of the world economy that is comprised of open economies which are inhabited by infinitely-lived agents. Our main point of departure from the standard exogenous growth neoclassical model is that we endow agents with recursive preferences. Specifically, we follow Farmer and Lahiri (2002) and use a modified version of recursive preferences. The key implication of the Farmer-Lahiri specification is that it generates a determinate steady state wealth distribution within a growing world economy, a feature that typical models with recursive preferences cannot generate. The problem with the standard recursive preference specification is that it is inconsistent with balanced growth. The existence of balanced growth requires homothetic preferences. However, under homothetic preferences, the asymptotic wealth distribution in multi-agent environments is either degenerate or reflects the initial wealth distribution. The Farmer-Lahiri approach avoids this problem by making preferences time dependent. Agents in our model care about their relative position in the world distribution. World average wealth enters our preferences as an external effect. This time dependence in the model allows for preferences to exhibit increasing marginal impatience which is a necessary condition for a non-degenerate asymptotic wealth distribution. A positive productivity shock in our model induces a rise in saving which ultimately reverts back to its prior level due to the increasing marginal impatience of agents as their wealth rises relative to world wealth, thereby preserving an determinate asymptotic wealth distribution. In our quantitative work we divide the world into three regions: the G7, sub-Saharan Africa, and Emerging countries. We calibrate a three-country version of the model to match the world saving distribution in 1970 across these three groups. Using only the measured productivity shocks in these three groups between 1970 and 2010 as exogenous drivers, we then show that the model can generate both the stable average saving rate as well as the rising dispersion of saving observed in the data. Lastly, we show that the model can also generate sudden and long-lived switches in savings, a feature that is also observed in the data.

Suggested Citation

  • Amartya Lahiri & Colin Caines, 2013. "Explaining World Savings," 2013 Meeting Papers 539, Society for Economic Dynamics.
  • Handle: RePEc:red:sed013:539
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Horioka, Charles Yuji & Terada-Hagiwara, Akiko, 2012. "The determinants and long-term projections of saving rates in Developing Asia," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 128-137.
    2. Gerhard Sorger, 2000. "Income and wealth distribution in a simple model of growth," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 16(1), pages 23-42.
    3. Elwin Tobing, 2012. "Demography and cross-country differences in savings rates: a new approach and evidence," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 25(3), pages 963-987, July.
    4. Lucas, Robert Jr. & Stokey, Nancy L., 1984. "Optimal growth with many consumers," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 139-171, February.
    5. Farmer, Roger E.A. & Lahiri, Amartya, 2005. "Recursive preferences and balanced growth," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 61-77, November.
    6. Philippe Aghion & Patrick Bolton, 1997. "A Theory of Trickle-Down Growth and Development," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 64(2), pages 151-172.
    7. Oded Galor & Joseph Zeira, 1993. "Income Distribution and Macroeconomics," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 60(1), pages 35-52.
    8. S. Rao Aiyagari, 1994. "Uninsured Idiosyncratic Risk and Aggregate Saving," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 109(3), pages 659-684.
    9. Jesús Fernández‐Villaverde & Samuel Hurtado & Galo Nuño, 2023. "Financial Frictions and the Wealth Distribution," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 91(3), pages 869-901, May.
    10. Norman Loayza & Klaus Schmidt-Hebbel & Luis Servén, 2000. "What Drives Private Saving Across the World?," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 82(2), pages 165-181, May.
    11. Francesco Caselli & James Feyrer, 2007. "The Marginal Product of Capital," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 122(2), pages 535-568.
    12. Chatterjee, Satyajit, 1994. "Transitional dynamics and the distribution of wealth in a neoclassical growth model," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 97-119, May.
    13. Thomas Piketty, 1997. "The Dynamics of the Wealth Distribution and the Interest Rate with Credit Rationing," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 64(2), pages 173-189.
    14. King, Robert G. & Plosser, Charles I. & Rebelo, Sergio T., 1988. "Production, growth and business cycles : I. The basic neoclassical model," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(2-3), pages 195-232.
    15. Dolmas, Jim, 1996. "Balanced-growth-consistent recursive utility," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 657-680, April.
    16. Epstein, Larry G & Hynes, J Allan, 1983. "The Rate of Time Preference and Dynamic Economic Analysis," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 91(4), pages 611-635, August.
    17. Boud, John III, 1990. "Recursive utility and the Ramsey problem," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 326-345, April.
    18. Ben-Gad, Michael, 1998. "Balanced-growth-consistent recursive utility and heterogeneous agents," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 459-462, November.
    19. Jesús Fernández‐Villaverde & Samuel Hurtado & Galo Nuño, 2025. "Corrigendum: Financial Frictions and the Wealth Distribution," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 93(4), pages 1491-1496, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrés Rius & Carolina Rom�n, 2021. "Countries in the hamster’s wheel?: Nurkse- Duesenberry demonstration effects and the determinants of saving," Revista Cuadernos de Economia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, FCE, CID, vol. 40(82), pages 193-225.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gerhard Sorger, 2000. "Income and wealth distribution in a simple model of growth," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 16(1), pages 23-42.
    2. Brueckner, Markus & Kikuchi, Tomoo & Vachadze, George, 2023. "Transitional dynamics of the saving rate and economic growth," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(2), pages 482-505, March.
    3. Bertola, Giuseppe, 2000. "Macroeconomics of distribution and growth," Handbook of Income Distribution, in: A.B. Atkinson & F. Bourguignon (ed.), Handbook of Income Distribution, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 9, pages 477-540, Elsevier.
    4. Thomas J. Sargent & John Stachurski, 2024. "Dynamic Programming: Finite States," Papers 2401.10473, arXiv.org.
    5. Richard M. H. Suen, 2014. "Time Preference And The Distributions Of Wealth And Income," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 52(1), pages 364-381, January.
    6. FALL, Falilou, 2005. "Endogenous persistent inequality," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2005094, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    7. Kiminori Matsuyama, 2000. "Endogenous Inequality," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 67(4), pages 743-759.
    8. Marla Ripoll & Juan Carlos Cordoba, 2011. "A Contribution to the Economic Theory of Fertility," 2011 Meeting Papers 1207, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    9. Keith Blackburn & David Chivers, 2015. "Fearing the worst: the importance of uncertainty for inequality," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 60(2), pages 345-370, October.
    10. Dilip Mookherjee & debraj Ray, 2005. "Occupational Diversity and Endogenous Inequality," Boston University - Department of Economics - The Institute for Economic Development Working Papers Series dp-142, Boston University - Department of Economics.
    11. Farmer, Roger E.A. & Lahiri, Amartya, 2005. "Recursive preferences and balanced growth," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 61-77, November.
    12. Kim, Dong-Hyeon & Chen, Ting-Cih & Lin, Shu-Chin, 2020. "Does oil drive income inequality? New panel evidence," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 137-152.
    13. Haiping Zhang, 2017. "Wealth inequality and financial development: revisiting the symmetry breaking mechanism," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 63(4), pages 997-1025, April.
    14. Koichiro Sano & Yasunobu Tomoda, 2019. "Persistent income gaps in an occupational choice model with multi‐goods," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(1), pages 1-20, March.
    15. Abhijit V. Banerjee & Benjamin Moll, 2010. "Why Does Misallocation Persist?," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 2(1), pages 189-206, January.
    16. Azariadis, Costas & Stachurski, John, 2005. "Poverty Traps," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 5, Elsevier.
    17. Ruitu Xu & Yifei Min & Tianhao Wang & Zhaoran Wang & Michael I. Jordan & Zhuoran Yang, 2023. "Finding Regularized Competitive Equilibria of Heterogeneous Agent Macroeconomic Models with Reinforcement Learning," Papers 2303.04833, arXiv.org.
    18. Falkinger, Josef & Grossmann, Volker, 2013. "Oligarchic land ownership, entrepreneurship, and economic development," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 206-215.
    19. Atolia, Manoj & Chatterjee, Santanu & Turnovsky, Stephen J., 2012. "Growth and inequality: Dependence on the time path of productivity increases (and other structural changes)," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 331-348.
    20. Ben Mimoun, Mohamed & Boukhatem, Jamel & Raies, Asma, 2024. "Aggregate demand and inflation response to monetary policy shocks in Tunisia," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 592-612.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • E20 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • F30 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - General
    • F40 - International Economics - - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:red:sed013:539. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christian Zimmermann (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sedddea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.