IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/red/sed013/525.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Intensive Margin of Imports and Firm Productivity

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Peters

    (Yale University)

  • Claire Lelarge

    (CREST)

  • Joaquin Blaum

    (Brown University)

Abstract

We study the behavior of firms as importers using a micro dataset of French manufacturing firms. We focus on firms' allocation of expenditure across different inputs and different supplying countries (varieties) of each input. We consider a general framework that nests the available models of import demand as special cases. In the model, firms are heterogeneous in their factor neutral productivity, production is subject to constant returns and input qualities are common across firms. We show that the theory has a robust intensive margin prediction: conditional on the sourcing strategy, defined as the list of products and varieties sourced, expenditure shares across products and varieties are fully determined by price-adjusted qualities, that is, by characteristics of the supplying country. In particular, firm productivity should not affect relative input demand once the sourcing strategy is controlled for. Our main contribution lies on providing a careful test of this prediction. Using a micro data set of French firms we show that this property is not supported by the data. The particular direction in which the theory is rejected is economically meaningful: holding firms' sourcing strategy fixed, larger firms spend a higher proportion of their budget on their most important variety and on varieties that are more expensive. We interpret these results as evidence of a complementarity between firm productivity and input quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Peters & Claire Lelarge & Joaquin Blaum, 2013. "The Intensive Margin of Imports and Firm Productivity," 2013 Meeting Papers 525, Society for Economic Dynamics.
  • Handle: RePEc:red:sed013:525
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:red:sed013:525. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christian Zimmermann (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sedddea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.