IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Political Turnover, Dynamic Separation of Power and Efficiency

Listed author(s):
  • Alessandro Riboni

    (University of Montreal)

  • Facundo Piguillem

    (Einaudi Institute for Economics and Fina)

This paper contributes to a large literature studying the interaction between institution and fiscal outcomes. We provide two general contributions. First, we argue that we should not take it for granted that there exist institutions that work well in all environments: specific institutions may increase spending in certain countries, but not in others. Second, we find that countries characterized by the same parameters and by the same institutions may end up with different spending levels. This suggests that in addition to institutions, multiplicity may help explain the wide variation of spending levels across countries. Model and Results: In this paper, policy makers have a time-inconsistent temptation to increase current spending. We study a legislature where legislators sequentially negotiate over spending and solve for the Markov-perfect equilibria of the dynamic game. Our goal is to investigate which institutions help reduce inefficient spending. The model generates non-trivial strategic interactions between current and future legislators. First, there is strategic complementarity: the perspective that more future policymakers will limit spending provide stronger incentives to be fiscally responsible in the current period. Complementarity leads to multiple equilibria, which are ranked according to total spending. Second, in the model there is also a region of parameters where strategic substitutability is observed: when the vast majority of future policymakers are expected to favor low spending, it is less costly to procrastinate a spending cut. As a result of these strategic interactions, we argue that changes of the political environment may have different effects in countries characterized by different parameters. This is because the type (and strength) of strategic interactions at work in each country may be different. For instance, we obtain that an increase of political turnover reduces spending in countries where the average legislators' spending bias is sufficiently moderate, but increases it in countries where the average bias is severe. Similarly, we find that electoral laws that reduce the number of extreme-party legislators also have opposite consequences on spending levels depending on which country they are applied to. Finally, we investigate the consequences of stronger majority requirements.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by Society for Economic Dynamics in its series 2013 Meeting Papers with number 368.

in new window

Date of creation: 2013
Handle: RePEc:red:sed013:368
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Society for Economic Dynamics Marina Azzimonti Department of Economics Stonybrook University 10 Nicolls Road Stonybrook NY 11790 USA

Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:red:sed013:368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christian Zimmermann)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.